Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That doesn't make a difference. You called azodicarbonamide harmless. Companies have a culture. Their history reflects that.


Just a pedantic observation. They never claimed any specific level of harmlessness. What they said was:

> I'm sure they replaced it with some other equally harmless dough conditioner

That could easily mean they replaced a toxic chemical with an equally toxic one.

That being said, the words used certainly imply the thought that the chemical is 'mostly harmless'.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: