I find it really counterproductive whenever people bring the following arguments to the table (during discussions):
"I don't use it" or "Facebook does not use it". So? What does that prove? Who taught you gentleman, to use such useless arguments in a debate. It sounds like "I do not believe unit tests are useful because I do not use them". Your logic is reversed.
"I don't use it" or "Facebook does not use it". So? What does that prove? Who taught you gentleman, to use such useless arguments in a debate. It sounds like "I do not believe unit tests are useful because I do not use them". Your logic is reversed.
BTW Einstein did not unit test either.