Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Employers in the US can:

- require routine drug testing, even for drugs that are legal in your state

- require routine credit checks

- mandate attire standards

- dictate grooming standards

- require employees to routinely expose themselves to hazardous materials

- require travel to hazardous locations

- perform duties that are known to result in serious injury or loss of life

- require vaccines for things like the flu

- require employees to sit still in front of a computer for 8+ hours at a time, for months on end.

The remedy in the US for people who do not like these factors is to not work for employers that have different tolerances for physical safety than does the employee. I don't see how conditioning employment on receiving a vaccination for Covid is materially more dangerous than requiring an employee to work on sea-based drilling rig or in a coal mine.



While in general I agree, there are some cases where all employers make the same requirements. In that case, there is no choice the worker can make that doesn't result in the condition being there, and so there is no choice. As an example, since binding arbitration clauses were found to be enforceable in court, they have since been added to nearly all contracts. As a result, there is no choice that does not result in being locked out of the legal system.

That said, I do not think that vaccination is an unreasonable requirement.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: