That's a very good question. What should we do in a future where one's sexual orientation could be outed by a government camera picking up a homosexual kiss behind a corner... Or by a private store security camera and a store owner who's an anti-homosexuality fundamentalist?

"Ban cameras" isn't going to cut it, because if you make it an issue of either-or, society's definitely going to choose stores being able to protect themselves over the relatively low risk of occasional homosexual outing. So we need a better approach than "ban cameras" (maybe the store owner is fined for sharing private information unredacted that's unrelated to a store security issue? Or we find out that that sort of thing happens all the time, so maybe homosexuality isn't a horrible society-destroying perversion that ignorant people were assuming it is?).