How is an accusation of it being an ad at all a stretch? It’s a placement offering a deal for a company, whether or not it was paid for. That seems to fit the definition of an ad to me.
Furthermore, I’m not sure where you got the idea that I am telling you to move to chrome or indeed do anything at all, given the comment to which you replied says “me” 3 times in it. I was quite evidently purely asking about my own situation.
Their argument, per the GP’s link, is that they want to provide their users additional value. This does not achieve that for me, hence I want to remove it.
I have not yet had a chance to upgrade and try to disable it, as I am not near my computer right now to upgrade to the latest release. Hence why I asked for them to provide a means of removing it. If that already exists, fantastic! It achieves precisely the outcome I’m after.
It's not in the latest release it's from a release or two ago so you probably already have it disabled.
But its not only ads they serve up, it's closer to the Google Now feed you see on chrome new tabs in android or Google now.
The accusation was that they're not adding value or in fact negating it. My complaint was that Google or alternatives don't do nearly as much as they could to ad value - so to call out Firefox like this just makes no sense.
I will mention they're pushing pocket hard and I think this sis the route they're going for monetary gains. It's gross but it's pretty easy to remove it all from context menus via user chrome CSS anyway.
I guess you think I should use chrome? Because that has zero to do with serving me up more profitable advertising at all..
But aside from that, you do know you can disable everything on the home page under general preferences - including the ad section.
And worst case if they remove the option, ublock will still block it and if it can't you can just disable it's display in userChrome.css.