Yes, FUSE is slower than in-ring0 implementation, even by the sheer overhead of ... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		SSLy on Sept 21, 2018 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Apple File System Reference [pdf] Yes, FUSE is slower than in-ring0 implementation, even by the sheer overhead of the syscalls.

ianai on Sept 21, 2018 [–]

Iirc, it’s relatively straight forward to migrate to a module though?

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact