Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The problem is that the economical background of our society is based on exploiting all resources and pushing the limits of the society itself (both with high reproduction rates and in mass production of goods).

If we want to change the climate situation, we first need to change the whole economic system and related political measures.



Speaking more as an engineer than as a contrarian here: If that's your plan, you're going to fail at it.


That's definitely what Kings used to say. And chieftains of hunter/gatherer tribes before them.


When you say "our society is based on ... high reproduction rates", which society are you talking about, and which reproduction rates?

Currently most of humanity has less than replacement level of fertility:

http://www.economist.com/node/14743589

Are you saying that the economy is failing because of low reproduction rates?


I agree with you, but my point is that is impossible, because of said power brokers not willing to risk their power.


If history relied on those in power giving up their power, rather than people taking power away from them, we would be living in a very different world.

Political vs. technological is a false dichotomy. There are many other dimensions to the world. Personally, I think we need a monumental social breakthrough akin to the enlightenment to solve climate change.


But people don't rebel until some force was clearly threatening their survival. If people rebel only when their immediate survival is threatened by global warming, it will already be too late.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: