Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

"I would say he's not the root cause of the issues but he is the root cause of Uber's success."

I can't agree with that statement. He's responsible for both. He doesn't get to take credit for the good and ignore the bad.



Are you saying it's impossible? Or just not fair?


I am going to say it's impossible. He is responsible for the company. That means both the good and the bad.

And his past actions have shown that's not far off; that he does behave in a manner consistent with Uber's bad actions.


Good or bad, you reap what you sow.


You do reap what you sow? Or you ought to reap what you sow?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: