## Executive Summary

This analysis demonstrates that Hacker News's (Y Combinator) official "no politics" policy actually constitutes a political choice that selectively structures which geopolitical topics can be discussed from a technological angle.

---

## 1. HN's Official Policy

### Stated Rules - Most political, crime, or celebrity-related topics are considered "off-topic" - Exception: if they constitute "evidence of a new interesting phenomenon" - Declared focus: "what satisfies intellectual curiosity" in tech and startups - In 2016: organized a "political detox week" explicitly recognizing that "political conflicts cause harm here"

### Justification Avoid flamewars and maintain a constructive discussion space centered on technology.

---

## 2. Selective Application: Ukraine vs Gaza Case

### Ukraine (2022-2025): Significant Coverage

*Accepted and widely discussed topics:* - Ukraine's call to the hacker community (March 2022): major post, numerous comments - Cyberattacks and Russia-Ukraine cyber warfare - Hacktivism (Anonymous, etc.) - Technological infrastructure - Cybersecurity operations

*Implicit justification:* Clear and direct tech angle

### Gaza (2023-2025): Minimal Coverage

*Topics nearly absent despite obvious tech angle:* - Destruction of internet infrastructure in Gaza (rarely mentioned) - Military AI systems (see next section) - Impact on Palestinian tech workers - Vercel/Netanyahu controversy (tech CEO + Netanyahu)

*Result:* Even with obvious technical angles, low visibility or moderation

---

## 3. The Revealing Case: AI in Gaza

### Documented Israeli AI Systems

#### *"Lavender"* - *Function:* AI system listing tens of thousands of Palestinian men algorithmically identified as linked to Hamas or Palestinian Islamic Jihad - *Scale:* Approximately 37,000 Palestinians marked as suspected militants - *Use:* Target recommendations for strikes

#### *"The Gospel" (Habsora)* - *Function:* Rapid identification of combatants and equipment - *Official claim:* Reduces civilian casualties - *Use:* Target selection and prioritization

#### *"Where's Daddy?"* - *Function:* Determines when a target is at a specific location - *Documented use:* Target individuals when they are at home at night with their families

### Tech Relevance for HN

These systems check *all the boxes* of popular HN topics: - Cutting-edge artificial intelligence - Machine learning and automated decision systems - AI ethics (recurring HN topic) - Mass surveillance and data science - Questions about war automation - Algorithmic transparency - AI system bias and errors

### Actual Presence on HN

- *Yes, there have been posts* (notably on Lavender in April 2024) - *But:* Limited visibility, restricted discussions - *Contrast:* Equivalent AI ethics topics elsewhere are widely debated

---

## 4. Other Examples of Selective Moderation

### Vercel Case (September 30, 2025)

*The facts:* - Vercel CEO (Guillermo Rauch) posts selfie with Benjamin Netanyahu - Private meeting on AI in New York - Consequences: employee resignations, client contract cancellations ($5,000-10,000/month)

*HN Relevance:* - Major company in dev ecosystem (Next.js, hosting) - Direct business impact on community - Questions about political engagement of tech CEOs - Documented economic consequences

*Result:* Limited or moderated discussions on HN

---

## 5. The Political Paradox of "No Politics"

### The Thesis

*"No politics" is itself a political position* that:

1. *Normalizes certain conflicts* (Ukraine = legitimate to discuss from tech angle) 2. *Marginalizes other conflicts* (Gaza = not legitimate even with obvious tech angle) 3. *Determines which violence is "tech"* and which is not 4. *Structures the field of the thinkable* in the tech community

### The Consequences

*What is made visible:* - Nation-state cyber warfare (if adversary = Russia) - AI ethics (except specific military applications) - Digital freedoms (Western context)

*What is made invisible:* - Actual use of AI for automated warfare - Impact of tech choices on civilian populations (non-Western context) - Responsibility of tech actors in conflicts

### The Structural Effect

By excluding Gaza under the pretext of "neutrality," HN: - Prevents the tech community from debating the actual use of its tools - Creates a blind spot on applied AI ethics - Implicitly privileges certain geopolitical narratives

---

## 6. Conclusion

### The Fundamental Contradiction

Hacker News claims to be "apolitical" while making editorial choices that: 1. Favor certain geopolitical angles 2. Marginalize other equally technically relevant angles 3. Prevent crucial ethical discussions about technology use

### The Irony

AI systems like Lavender, Gospel, and "Where's Daddy?" represent exactly the type of topic HN should cover intensively: - Automation of life-or-death decisions - Algorithmic transparency - AI system bias - Developer responsibility

Yet these topics remain in moderation's blind spot.

### The Central Question

*Can we really separate "tech" and "politics" when technology itself has direct political consequences?*

HN moderation implicitly answers: yes, but only for certain geopolitical contexts.

---

## Sources and Dates

- HN moderation policy: 2016 (political detox week) - Ukraine call to hackers: March 2022 - Lavender revelations: April 2024 (existing but limited HN posts) - Vercel/Netanyahu affair: September 30, 2025 - Date of this analysis: October 2025

---

## Methodological Note

This analysis is based on: - Web research on HN coverage of different conflicts - Documentation of Israeli military AI systems - Comparison of topics with equivalent tech relevance - Observation of moderation patterns

*Limitation:* Impossibility to precisely quantify the number of deleted vs accepted posts (moderation data not public)