Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | wesleyfsmith's commentslogin

Dang, this look awesome, excited to try it out!


Interesting product, I use moralis quite a bit for this type of service. I'm curious how you differentiate yourselves from them.


Thanks - we aim to have a broader set of chains and testnets, that can all be queried from a single endpoint. We also provide a couple of things that make it easier to deal with media, like cached versions and preview sizes via a CDN. We also pull in active floor prices and collection metadata from multiple marketplaces, even when it's stored off-chain.


Yes, you are correct that the computational of running the smart contracts is very small in relation to the proof of work.

But actually, the main cost is not computation, but storage. Storage (any variable that is holding data inside the contracts) is extremely expensive because there is very little of it, and has to be persisted on the blockchain forever.

In fact, view functions that don't change the state of the blockchain can be executed for free at any time.


Related to that, people have started using old procedural generation tricks to store "large" amounts of data on-chain. For example, as far as I understand it, Aavegotchi [1] stores base layer SVGs, metadata and functions to use these and render the actual end-product at view-time.

Blockchain constraints are eerily reminiscent of the demoscene [2][3][4] (just using the opportunity to share stuff I like, don't mind it).

[1]: https://github.com/aavegotchi/aavegotchi-contracts

[2]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bD1wWY1YD-M

[3]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJegM2UgEZU

[4]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0w_xEUoK79o


This: If you don't have some noteworthy transaction cost, the network gets flooded with spam past its other scalability limits.

You can shrink it somewhat in absolute terms, but you need to throttle them somehow.


Seems really promising, but how does it work with browser extensions? For instance, I'm looking for something like this that will help me test my crypto app that uses metamask at various points through the app.

Also, no public pricing page is a bit of a turn off, especially when I created an account and still couldn't find any pricing info.


Hi Wesley, you should be able to see the price on here now: https://app.preflight.com/account/billing. Sorry if we made a mistake

It should be no problem with MetaMask.

Edit: Also listened to everyone and put the pricing on the web page: https://preflight.com/pricing


How can you interact with another browser plugin from a plugin, that doesn't seem to make sense


I'm sorry I am a little confused. We use Chrome extension to record your Browser tests. (Not browser plugin tests)


Yes I would also be curious to hear more about your experiences


This is exactly how I feel too...


Wow, really well said. I think that's the clearest way I've heard this idea expressed on the US v China competition


Hahha I noticed that too....


The FAQs are amazing haha


Can someone explain to me how this differs from Apollo? Is it that it has a tighter integration with the DB layer?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: