Are you still talking about Opus 4.5 I’ve been working on a Rust, kotlin and c++ and it’s been doing well. Incredible at C++, like the number of mistakes it doesn’t make

Had to look it up but I found Indian and Nigeria specifically as country of origin for work related migration

Economic migration is very different from asylum seekers, as the person above claimed.

The vast majority of people arriving from Nigeria and India do so on visas, and would have near zero chance of getting asylum claims approved.

I’m hoping this is a puppy trait. Thats what my one year old golden-doodle does

Sorry - my 9 year old golden doodle still doesn't get the concept of fetch. He's an expert at keep-away though. Throw the toy or ball, he'll chase it gleefully, then come back to just out of reach, drop the toy, and hover over it waiting for me to make a move at it. He'll lunge for the toy, back up a bit, drop it, and the cycle continues.

4 year old golden doodle, exactly the same thing.

I spend an hour in a field with my golden doodle, refusing to chase her. She had to bring the ball back to me and drop it. I threw the ball twice in that hour. The rest of the time she spent running past me trying to coax me into chasing her.

The least food motivated dog I've ever owned. Nothing brought her back, not even cheese.

Have fun turkey99!

It can be trained, at least in some cases.

When attention/reward/engagement cease when the ball is not returned and dropped - literally turn around and walk away dejectedly - but a successful return results in praise, treats, and MORE FETCH, my dog quickly learned to bring it back.

For my sister's dog, the key is to have a second ball alluringly held ready to throw - the one that's already in the mouth is forgotten about except as a means to get the second ball thrown. The dog has to bring it "all the way!" (point at the ball that was dropped halfway back) before the second ball is thrown.

It's definitely a tough one to solve, though, especially when the act of running around with the ball in the mouth is the rewarding behavior...

I’ve had this scenario several times.

The last was when the company I worked for was acquired. We needed to adopt their CSS library for all our applications.

I changed their component based library to have semantic style css and dropped it right in.

Depends where you are socio-economically

I’d rather be poor in the UK I’d rather be chronically sick in the UK, that is if I’m not already wealthy and insured I’d rather be in the US and middle class - particularly with inherited wealth I choose to live in the UK as an high level (middle) manager with my similar status American wife

What about vaccines? In the UK we all have a scar from BCG vaccine

Its not given routinely anymore in the UK, since the likelihood of infection is so low. If you’re at higher risk you can still get it.

https://www.nhs.uk/vaccinations/bcg-vaccine-for-tuberculosis...

Seems a bit of a stretch. Git is not linear, and there’s no consensus mechanisms

git is linear, if multiple users have a different main branch history you have a problem.

Pull requests in github is actually very similar conceptually to a consensus mechanism used in crypto currencies. Everyone has an identical copy of the main branch with an identical history of every commit in order, a PR is saying "I think this commit goes next" and, if you use code reviews, the PR approval is consensus.

This is the most unhinged thing I have ever read about git ever. Please share whatever you are hitting.

Have you ever seen a git graph? Does this look linear? https://tortoisegit.org/docs/tortoisegit/images/RevisionGrap...

Have you considered that the single source of truth, the chain that has consensus in the blockchain terminology, is the main/primary branch?

All secondary branches are works in progress that may be proposed as new commits to main.

Sticking with the blockchain comparison, every side branch in got is akin to potential blocks that miners are working on.

Well, that’s it. I am done with this site.

Hah, sounds good. I still don't get your argument here, I would be curious to hear more.

My point is that git is a data store involving a genesis block (initial commit), blocks of changes/diff's, tracked in sequential order, and with a form of consensus (code reviews and merges to primary).

What is missing that makes it not a blockchain?

And my caveat here, I can't stand arguments for cryptocurrencies and have never purchased any. Blockchain as a concept is fine, and git is a blockchain as best I can tell.

Let it go

I’d argue in the UK probation periods are effectively 2 years long.

Yes, it’s a great tool for integration. We have a product suite and it’s our chosen way to connect products.

No, this is just separation of concerns. Each thing that was separated is now encapsulated and can be reused in different places.