Finally, the missing block to building geocities v2!

We need a new an HTML5 what-you-see-is-what-you-get editor (a new Frontpage/Dreamweaver). Sadly, the HTML "contentEditable" API is in a very broken state.

We actually integrate with PagerDuty and a bunch of other services already (users can submit integrations too) :-)

Existing integrations: http://try.crashlytics.com/integrations/

Submit integrations using: https://github.com/crashlytics/crashlytics-services

The only thing those integrations do is handle the existing Crashlytics-defined alerts. I'm not allowed to define my own alerts.

Agree. That's an area I personally want to address and am addressing. Oh the stories I have around that!

Yes - no brainer. :-)

Crashlytics is free :-)

Thanks ksar! Wait until you see what we've been working on ;-)

something something video?

[CENSORED] [REDACTED] [CENSORED] :P

Wayne here. I hear your loud and clear. Working on it.. :-)

This is super interesting. Right now we are limited by communication due to latency from speed of light. With quantum entanglement, does that mean no latency over great distances? Or is there a latency involved, even in quantum entanglement?

To perform any communication via entanglement, you're required to also have a regular, (sub-)luminal side-channel, otherwise it doesn't work.

So, no, instantaneous communication is not possible according to current science.

no, there's a theorem that states you cannot use quantum entanglement for communication: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-communication_theorem

With one exception, you could use them for a synchronised random number generator.

It's not as useful as you'd hope, since a cryptographic PRNG theoretically does the same thing (and you need to individually transport the bits ahead-of-time), but you can at least be sure the numbers are random and no-one is spying. Whether or not that counts as communication is up to you.

Having quantum entangled particles stored in some crystal sounds better than requiring direct optical cable connection between peers for some kinds of quantum computer resistant communication.

You still need direct connection and you still need to do key exchange. Whether you're exchanging keys or quantum particles for the purpose of generating keys is immaterial for the purposes of security.

You mean you would want to entangle two particles, move them apart over great distance and then use them to signal information, more or less instanteniously? That would not work.

Hey Joe, Wayne here with Crashlytics. Our mission is to provide the best-in-class mobile crash reporting tool. We actually do not charge :-) Let me know your thoughts once you've tried it. We power many top apps including Twitter, Vine, OpenTable, Yelp, Path, Square, and many others.

Also, thanks for the feedback on the invite flow -- I will look into that with the team today!