Not really. Software for each of them is clunky. You have to first buy one which is wifi enabled. Then you have to download an app from manufacturer and create a login password. Then you have to manually move/upload photos from camera roll to the corresponding app. After this, you have to to back to digital photo frame interface, select the appropriate picture and then tap "display this photo".

All of this should be one step. Ideally Like airdrop. I say "share" and it should magically show up on the photo frame. I should be able to download pics from reddit/imgur and display it on photo frame using a CLI/API.

You are asking the wrong people. The offshore people (i.e. people living in India) will just justify what they see as "part of culture". They are part of the problem, not part of the solution.

Talk to some expat Indians and you may get an answer.

As an expat, my reason is simple. Apathy!

I'm an expat Indian, been an American citizen for ~25 years, and have worked/traveled all over India. Agree on the apathy, but I think it's a bit more nuanced than the notion of apathy one might have around here.

In America, you are very likely to be admonished by a stranger for littering in a public place. Trash cans are everywhere, and the laws/regulations are enforced, so the risk-reward of littering/pollution is overwhelmingly in favor of proper disposal. Most of the population doesn't have to work 14-16 hour days, 6-7 days a week, so there's a lot of volunteered time to go around for maintaining public areas. There is public funding and enforced regulations to handle waste management, and industry employees have union representation.

India is diametrically opposite to this - it would be risky to admonish someone for littering, especially if they look wealthy, because rich Indians are usually above the law and consider themselves so. Everyone bribes the police, so anyone can pollute the environment for a price. In everyday life, the tragedy of the commons is certainly prevalent - there's already a pile of trash, so one more wrapper makes no difference. But there is also apathy in the sense that you're not going to admonish the person dumping a rickshaw full of trash into the river, because that's the only realistic way for him to feed his family, and it's probably the only economical option over dumping it somewhere yourself. And there isn't much evidence that paying more in taxes is going to do anything for the problem, and a lot of evidence that it will just line your local politician's pockets. The people who actually do the work are usually the poorest in society, and they don't know the dangers of lighting carcinogenic materials on fire.

To summarize with an anecdote - I saw my uncle throw an empty chip bag on a beautiful beach in Goa, so I picked it up and asked him why he couldn't just hold on to it for a while. He shouted back, "it's someone else's job to pick that up!"

My cousin in Karachi when I gave him a hard time about littering: “What are you stressing out about? This won’t be New York anytime soon”

Where I live every house has a garbage can in front, trucks pick it up once a week, and every public space has multiple garbage cans that get emptied on a regular schedule. I didn't set the system up, and other than paying a bill every few months I'm not involved in running the system. Nobody is. It's provided for us and we take advantage of it. I visited Mumbai and Pune last year, and I saw the trash problem first hand, but I have a hard time pinning the problem on apathy versus simply not having a functioning sanitation system. In other words, if you take the most well-meaning person, leave them holding a piece of trash, then deprive them of anywhere to dispose of it, where do you think it's going to go?

> if you take the most well-meaning person, leave them holding a piece of trash, then deprive them of anywhere to dispose of it, where do you think it's going to go?

Counterpoint: In Japan, I often had to haul my garbage quite a bit before I found a trash can to dispose of it. No litter though. (To be fair, there are other factors; most people don't eat on the go, and there are usually garbage cans near convenience stores and vending machines).

> [I]f you take the most well-meaning person, leave them holding a piece of trash, then deprive them of anywhere to dispose of it, where do you think it's going to go?

I'm definitely not the most well-meaning person, but that piece of trash is going to go into my pocket (or stay in my hands) until I see a sufficiently-empty trash can or dumpster to place it in. It'll stay with me until I get home if it has to.

I _do not_ get folks that toss trash around. It's just fuckin nuts.

People are telling you, even when you put it in a trash can, that trash can ends up getting emptied into a river or public space.

> ...that trash can ends up getting emptied into a river or public space.

13of40 is implying that that trash will not end up in a trash can, but will end up on the ground, because they believe that even the most well-meaning person will refuse to carry refuse with them until they locate a trash can. (I -and others- have direct evidence that supports disagreement with their bleak outlook.)

Aside from the occasional (American) football or baseball hooligan tipping over a can in "celebration", trash cans in my area get emptied into the trash-disposal truck that stops by on a regular schedule. It's legitimately regrettable that you live in a place where your trash cans get emptied into rivers or other common areas.

If what you're telling me is a true and accurate picture of the state of waste management in your area, then that's a crying shame. I sincerely hope that wherever you are, you and your compatriots a successfully able to convince enough people that the commons is worth protecting and that proper disposal of trash and other refuse is worth doing to change this sad state of affairs where you live.

You carry it like a normal person.

> As an expat, my reason is simple. Apathy!

I think it is not mere apathy but learned apathy. There is no way for the people to know who to hold accountable. The political structure is a mess. It's not even googleable.

In addition, most people don't know that they need to constantly harass their representative to get things done.

Lastly, after many decades of political decay, most rich people only clean up their high rise societies. No one fights for public streets.

That's why there are few traffic lights, no lanes on streets, no crosswalks, ruthless traffic etc. People need up-to-date websites with contact details of elected representatives so that the representatives can be spammed to death about their inaction.

Sequoia is well respected because they invest and generate returns for their investors, not for displaying any kind of morals.

It's not the morals I'm wondering about; it's the viability of the businesses. Investing in one of these companies is hoping you can cash out before the bubble pops. At least if you invest in a boring SaaS company, when the bubble pops, you might still have a boring SaaS company on the road to profitability.

If an exchange isn't misappropriating customer funds, it doesn't matter if the bubble pops. They facilitate transactions and take a fee in return. As long as they have customers and don't blow money all over the place, they should be profitable.

Risk management for traditional derivatives is hard, risk management for crypto derivatives is almost impossible.

Even if "exchange" doesn't misappropriating customer funds, the customers themselves can easily become insolvent in a moment, and then it will cascade to every other market participant.

If crypto stops appreciating, won't transaction volume collapse? I guess the question is how much crypto use is real (I'm sure there's a better word) and how much is speculative.

Well, github claims to be social network. Sooner or later these features were supposed to popup. Its a miracle it took so many years to come. Move to another platform is our only option.

Thanks for making this open source. What about the index? Are you open sourcing that also?

If I can solve the logistics of publishing that data, then sure. In its most compressed form it's still of order 100 Gb.

The intermediate goal is to have some standardized testing dataset of a couple of hundred megabytes to a gigabyte or so.

Like another commenter suggested, torrents might be a good solution once it's seeded

Cool. Looking forward to see the intermediate dataset.

I think you should post a ToDo list on the git repo. People can then contribute their skills.

Yeah, that's a good idea. I'm looking at a bunch of ideas for reducing the friction to contributing, still a bit of work that needs doing in that area.

We tried huggingface.co with great hope recently. Unfortunately, though their system was well orchestrated, we could not make progress on baby steps.

We uploaded our model to github and then downloaded to hugging face. Why the package installed correctly, it failed because underlying Glibc headers were compiled with a version that is different from Hugging face's. So, while the platform works for some situations, it still has a long way to go.

>> I was put off by the fact that she's wearing a mask in our 1-1 zoom meeting anyway

This is unfair. I was in the woman's shoes recently. Somone in her family may be having Covid!

She's in the company office (glass doors/walls, people moving in the background, etc). From my view it seems I was on a projector.

That explains why she is wearing a mask. Boss forced her to come to office and she is not comfortable coming in, yet!