For a fair comparison,

> if they don't comment on US affairs?

should be:

> If they ban their associates from commenting on US affairs

Because he'd be prosecuted/remanded by the military, unless something VERY lucky occurs.

bubbl.us

There are MINIMUM a dozen comparable scandals revealed in those emails.

This community's depth of political reading is super disappointing.

Why?

For a start, half of US adults are married, so aren't dating anyone at the moment. So that by itself seems to prove it right off the bat.

But beyond that, half of US adults are over 38, so likely many of these aren't dating even if they aren't married.

So seems obvious that fewer than half of US adults are dating at all, and obviously the only a proportion of that group will have also been dating ten years ago, as they won't be that old, or will have been previously married.

So how can half of all adults have an informed opinion on this?

Yeah, but those were proxy fighters from other lands, right? They don't count, according to most US/RUS public.....

Those wars are insignificant in comparison to world wars.

Still need one? Happy to help with the best price you'll find on powertools, handtools, or consumables. Drop an email address if interested.

Why?

because HN, more often than not, tends to take itself too seriously. a bit of levity here and there will not degrade HN.

Love Startpage, and get decent signals from them, but their ownership should be observed closely.

Their board list probably has some good hints.