"I'm having trouble finding one true activity monitor on mac.
I tried all of these on mac with certain criteria in mind (reliability, renicing, good UX):
- Activity Monitor: doesn't update charts when in background, doesn't show nice value, doesn't allow renice, doesn't hide idle processes
- Apple's top: non-standard, information overload, no nice/renice/idle/filter
- htop: doesn't show accurate process cpu usages (known bug awaiting release), no idle hiding. (Use latest release to avoid crashes.)
- btop: hangs (known bug awaiting release), no nice/renice/idle hiding
- bottom: basic
- gotop: I forget
- glances: pretty good, supports nice & renice. That or htop seem to be the only options for that. glances is CPU-heavy.
- zenith: also good, faster, and at least shows nice. (Crashes if you sort by it, known bug awaiting fix.)"
You're speaking of "GHC haskell" there. Yes that is the main stream - and this will get solved there sooner or later - but you can also do a fair amount of Haskell without GHC. Eg MicroHs is getting increasingly capable and I believe is highly bootstrappable.
> When Gnucash did something, I was never sure what actually happened. And sometimes it would crash. Was all my data safe? Hard to tell.
You express it exactly, I felt the same way with Gnucash, Quicken, and all the other non-plain-text accounting apps I tried. Finance was stressful enough without also worrying about messed-up data. That was perhaps the biggest motivation to switch to Ledger, when I found it.
Later, I often could not figure out how to make Ledger do something I knew it could do, and I often was surprised by a crash or wrong behaviour when it saw some new combination of features and data that hadn't been tested or implemented yet. This was a big motivation to write hledger.
reply