Is it an advantage though ? One of the main objections in the article is exactly that.
There's no atmosphere that helps with heat loss through convection, there's nowhere to shed heat through conduction, all you have is radiation. It is a serious engineering challenge for spacecrafts to getting rid of the little heat they generate, and avoid being overheated by the sun.
A typical CPU heatsink dissipates 10-30% of heat through radiation, and the rest through convection. In space you're in a vacuum so you can't disipated heat through convection.
You need to rework your physical equipment quite substantially to make up for the fact you can't shed 70-90% of the heat in the same manner as you can down here on Earth
This is so grim. What a stark difference to Japan. On one side there is a government setting up a new company, with the aim of competing at the highest end of the most complex technological process in existence. Meanwhile the EU is setting up bureaucrat managed funds to keep the remaining companies, currently suffering from the decline of the German auto industry, alive. Oh and they also paid TSMC to set up a factory, how pathetic.
What do you think the EU is? It's not a country, not a federative union. These things need a lot of discussions and synchronization among member countries, it does not work otherwise, so it takes time. I also hold the opinion that time is a resource the EU does not have, so it badly needs to reform itself - its framework no longer works for this "new age".
the #1 problem with the EU's administrative structure is that its power comes from below, i.e. from the member states. Any of them could pull a Brexit and the entire union could be in jeopardy.
The #2 problem is language. Despite what many on HN think, European borders very much exist. They exist via language and bureaucracy.
These two combine to create many problems the EU and Europe in general has. The lack of vision, the excruciatingly slow bureaucracy, both are symptoms of the same underlying problems.
Last time I spent a month in Norway I repeatedly had various residents explain to me that various things were the way they were "because we are a socialist country".
If they call themselves "socialist" then I will too.
Well, there is a difference between "this is a socialist country" and "I am a socialist".
Granted though, that under a functioning democracy, there will be overlap: if the country is x then most likely at least a plurality of voters support x. It doesn't mean that "all citizens support x" or "any specific citizen supports x and self identifies themself an x-ist".
> Well, there is a difference between "this is a socialist country" and "I am a socialist".
To be clear, the former is what I was repeatedly told. Nobody personally self-identified themselves as a socialist to me, they described their country as socialist.
Mostly out of curiosity, a read on a TCP connection could easily block for a month - how does the I/O timeout interface look like ? e.g. if you want to send an application level heartbeat when a read has blocked for 30 seconds.
This is very true. Most examples of async io I've seen - regardless of the framework - gloss over timeouts and cancellation. It's really the hardest part. Reading and writing asynchronously from a socket, or whatever, is the straightforward part.
I don't have a good answer for that yet, mostly because TCP reads are expected to be done through std.Io.Reader which isn't aware of timeouts.
What I envision is something like `asyncio.timeout` in Python, where you start a timeout and let the code run as usual. If it's in I/O sleep when the timeout fires, it will get woken up and the operation gets canceled.
I see something like this:
var timeout: zio.Timeout = .init;
defer timeout.cancel(rt);
timeout.set(rt, 10);
const n = try reader.interface.readVec(&data);
No, I'm targeting Zig 0.15. The new Io interface is not in master yet, it's still evolving. When it's merged to master and stable, I'll start implementing the vtable. But I'm just passing Runtime around, instead of Io. So you can easily migrate code from zio to std when it's released.
Yes, seems so - but they shut down a lot more terminals too, not just the seized ones.
And it seems the biggest reason for them shutting down the terminals was pressure from US Senator Maggie Hassan to shut down scam centers, not the government in Myanmar.
They've extended their range, so there's lots of cases where they don't have wild ones around, but there's still overlap, at least according to the article I read.
1. M. Ibericus queen + no male (unfertilized egg) -> M. Ibericus male.
2. M. Ibericus queen + M. Ibericus male -> M. Ibericus queen
3. M. Ibericus queen + M. Structor male -> M. Structor male, no genes from the mother
4. M. Ibericus queen + M. Structor male -> M. Structor/Ibericus hybrid female, (worker ant, infertile)
UK 5,6%
Azerbadjan 3,8%
Algeria 12,5%
Norway 30,1%
Other LNG 9,4%
USA LNG 27,2%
Russia 11,5%
Most of the "Other LNG" comes from Turkstream in the underlying data. Edit: I was wrong, Turkstream is included in "Russia", other sources points to Qatar and Nigeria being the largest part of "Other LNG"
United States 15,0%
Norway 13,5%
Kazakhstan 12,7%
Libya 9,0%
Saudi Arabia 6,6%
Nigeria 6,3%
United Kingdom 5,2%
Iraq 4,5%
Guyana 4,3%
Brazil 4,1%
Azerbaijan 4,1%
Algeria 3,4%
Russia 2,5%
Mexico 2,1%
Other 6,6%
There's no atmosphere that helps with heat loss through convection, there's nowhere to shed heat through conduction, all you have is radiation. It is a serious engineering challenge for spacecrafts to getting rid of the little heat they generate, and avoid being overheated by the sun.