Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | misir's commentslogin

From what I've seen, if you're depending on AWS, if something fails you too need someone 24x7 so that you can take action as well. Sometimes magic happens and systems recover after aws restarts their DNS, but usually the combination of event causes the application to get into an unrecoverable state that you need manual action. It doesn't always happen but you need someone to be there if it ever happens. Or bare minimum you need to evaluate if the underlying issue is really caused by AWS or something else has to be done on top of waiting for them to fix.

How many problems is AWS able to handle for you that you are never aware of though?

How many problems do you think there are?

I've only had one outage I could attribute to running on-prem, meanwhile it's a bit of a joke with the non-IT staff in the office that when "The Internet" (i.e. Cloudflare, Amazon) goes down with news reports etc our own services are all running fine.


I am not sure if the replies are serious or sarcastic

All aws is selling a web gui on top of free software. You still have to know ins and outs of the software to manage it properly.

Heck their support is shit too. I have talked to them to figure out an issue on their own in house software, they couldn’t help. My colleague happened to know what was wrong and fixed the issue with a switch of a checkbox.


I used to have a middleware that replaced generic http error responses with http.cat pics. One time a VIP somehow got into a URL that returned http 400 response on the website and got mad.

I ended up getting a call to explain why the website is showing middle finger to our VIP customer.


still, probably better than a 450 error, at least

That's the whole point. Websites that try to block scraping attempts will let google scrape without any hurdle because of google's ads and search network. This gives google some advantage over new players because as a new name brand you are hardly going to convince a website to allow scraping even if your product may actually be more advantageous to the website (for example assume you made a search engine that doesn't suck like google, and aggregates links instead of copying content from your website).

Proxies in comparison can allow new players to have some playing chance. That said I doubt any legitimate & ethical business would use proxies.


I wonder if these colors are a kind of a watermark that are hardcoded as system instructions. Almost all slopware made using claude have the same color palette. So much for a random token generator to be this consistent

Yep, and I refuse to use sites that look like this. Lovable built frontend/landing pages have a similar feel. Instant lost of trust and desire to try it out.

Its interesting - AI has a certain style. You can see it in pictures and even text content. It does instantly get my guard up.

That's interesting - do you think because it's familiar to you?

Would it be the case for folks who don't have any idea what Lovable is.

Familiar UI is similar to what Tailwind or Bootstrap offers, do they do something different to keep it fresh?

Average internet users/consumers are likely used to the default Shopify checkout.


Its probably more of a me "problem". But I'm sure there are plenty of others that share my sentiment. It doesn't really have anything to do with it being familiar, familiar can be good, but what I'm talking about is a familiar ugliness and lack of intention.

The Stripe or Shopify checkout is familiar, but it only became familiar because it was well designed and people wanted to keep using it.

Also when its obvious someone used an LLM, it bleeds into my overall opinion of the product whether the product is good or not. I assume less effort was put into the project, which is probably a fair assumption.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mode_collapse

Ask any modern (post-GPT-2) LLM about a random color/name/city repeatedly a few dozen times, and you'll see it's not that random. You can influence this with a prompt, obviously, but if the prompt stays the same each time, the output is always very similar despite the existence of thousands of valid alternatives. Which is the case for any vibecoded thing that doesn't specify the color palette, in particular.

This effect is largely responsible for slop (as in annoying stereotypes). It's fixable in principle, but there's pretty little research and I don't see big AI shops care enough.


Emojis on every line are an AI tell. The times I do use AI (shhhh...) I always remove them and tweak the language a bit.

Before LLMs became big, I used emojis in my PRs and merge requests for fun and to break up the monotony a bit. Now I avoid them, lest I be accused of being a bot.

Isn't it mostly ChatGPT that does that?

Grok almost never uses emojis.


I think author has a point when he didn’t needed all those extra features.

But then they did made a bad choice for paying for loom. They could have just learned (or used llm) to make a bash script to use ffmpeg for capturing screen to a file. Or OBS is a pretty good solution as well. And a ton others


JerBrains does something similar (after paying for a year I get perpetual license for the version released that year). I’m pretty happy and feel under control. I have been paying them for years now and in case they screw up I will stop my subscription and still can download and use old version. Sure I will be missing on some bug fixes but I have used the software for a year already, I can live with those annoyances. It’s not like the new version will be all bug free either.

Tailwind is just bootstrap with marketing budget


nah


Or be proud once the history has been rewritten


“It says here in this history book that luckily, the good guys have won every single time. What are the odds?”

-- Norm MacDonald


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: