Nothing touches https://windmill.dev. There are some rare instances where you still may want Airflow, but even so, windmill and airflow complement each other well. If you need notebooks, I recommend https://docs.marimo.io/

One feature I would love to have is the ability to switch the model used for a message using a shorthand like #sonnet. Often, I don't want or need opus but I don't want to engage in a 3 step process where I need to:

1. switch models using /model 2. message 3. switch back to opus using /model

Help me help you (manage usage) by allowing me to submit something like "let's commit and push our changes to github #sonnet". Tasks like these rarely need opus-level intelligence and it comes up all the time.

Agreed. I was hoping that they would add this (model selection) to the template for defining subagents.

https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code/sub-agents

That would be great! I want to plan and analyze with opus but happy to use sonnet for code gen. Sonnet is faster and just as good at codegen. Opus is better at planning a change.

Ironically, Claude Code has me working in lower-level languages with more low-level tools than ever before, simply because of how powerful it is, particularly as a terminal tool. I've always been more of a GUI person, but now the editor I use most often is Helix.

If I've atrophied in certain aspects of my thinking, I honestly think I've more than made up for it in learning how to engineer the context and requirements for Claude Code more effectively and to quickly dive in to fix things without taking my hands off the keyboard and leaving the terminal.

Diversity of thought is a nice way to put it

well said

Super interesting idea. How feasible would it be to integrate this with Django?

Very! We had quite a few people do this at a hackathon we hosted this past weekend.

That's fantastic to hear. Did they configure django to use sqlalchemy as the ORM or were they able to make it work with django's?

Currently would have to be done on the SQLAlchemy side, but someone asked to contribute django directly. Let me see if they are still planning to do that and create/link an issue if you want to keep up with it.

You could also build an EnrichMCP server that calls your Django server manually

I agree, but there's always Deepseek. They're publishing and open-sourcing more than anyone these days.

I don't believe ChatGPT has an IQ of 120, and after reading the linked article, I don't think the author does either.

They almost certainly didn't reverse-engineer it.

Why was this flagged?