Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | judahmeek's commentslogin

The neologism is purposefully crude

A LinkedIn comment I made on an adjacent topic:

> If the job market is unfavourable to juniors, become senior.

That requires networking with a depth deep enough that other professionals are willing to critique your work.

So... open-source contributions, I guess?

This increases pressure on senior developers who are the current maintainers of open-source packages at the same time that AI is stealing the attention economy that previously rewarded open-source work.

Seems like we need something like blockchain gas on open-source PRs to reduce spam, incentivize open-source maintainers, and enable others to signal their support for suggestions while also putting money where their mouth is.


> If the job market is unfavourable to juniors, become senior.

Don't love your job, job your love.


> If the job market is unfavourable to juniors, become senior.

That’s just the regular LinkedIn nonsense. Very few people have the time and other resources to become seniors while unemployed. On top of that, it’s still unlikely that they’ll pass the HR filter without senior positions on their resumes, regardless of their actual knowledge.


> Pursuit of happiness doesn't imply being in a state of bliss all the time.

Sure, correcting "pursuit of happiness" to "pursuit of contentment/fulfillment/purpose" is pedantic, but it makes me happy ;p

It's also a connotative reminder to ourselves & others to seek rewards with longer time horizons


You're getting good advice and the best you can do is say I know better. Learn to be humble and listen to elders.

Yes! It depends on the company, of course, but I think plenty of people are going to fall for the perverse incentives while reviewing AI output for tech debt.

The perverse incentives being that tech debt is non-obvious & therefore really easy to avoid responsibility for.

Meanwhile, velocity is highly obvious & usually tired directly to personal & team performance metrics.

The only way I see to resolve this is strict enforcement of a comprehensive QA process during both the planning & iteration of an AI-assisted development cycle.

But when even people working at Anthropic are talking about running multiple agents in parallel, I get the idea that CTO's are not taking this seriously.


  > enforcement of a comprehensive QA process during both the planning & iteration of an AI-assisted development cycle
and a new bottleneck appears...

(i don't disagree with this take though, qa should be done from start to finish and integral every step of the way)


> as it does make all these LLMs orders of magnitude more useful

That seems like something that should be really easy to prove statistically.


As for "proving it statistically"—you're looking for utility, but I'm defining legitimacy. A constitution isn't a tool designed to statistically improve a metric; it is a framework to ensure that the system remains aligned with human agency. I am not building an LLM optimization plugin; I am building a benchmark for human-AI co-evolution

That's because physical programming ing is a ritual.

I'm not entirely sure what that means myself, so please speak up if my statement resonates with you.


It resonates. But as I see it, that kind of ritual I rather devote myself to at home. At work, the more efficient and rapidly we can get stuff dobe, the better.

Drawing and painting is a ritual to me as well. No one pays me for it and I am happy about that.


Corporations trying to "invent" agi is like that boss in bloodborne

The great thing about remote work & open source is that you can be one of the weird ones, create your own social interface for work, and let your accomplishments speak for themselves.

Protectionism was tried & has failed in other industries, most notably U.S. shipbuilding.

The Jones Act is arguably why China's Navy will soon dwarf the U.S.'s ancient fleet.


Luna is hardcore MAGA so she's definitely throwing out red meat.

> LLM marketers have succeeded at inducing collective delusion

That's the real trick & one I desperately wish I knew how to copy.

I know there's a connection to Dunning Kruger & I know that there's a dopamine effect of having a responsive artificial minion & there seems to be some of that "secret knowledge" sauce that makes cults & conspiracies so popular (there's also the promise of less effort for the same or greater productivity).

Add the list grows, I see the popularity, but I doubt I could easily apply all these qualities to anything else.


IMO algorithmically generated "social" media feeds combined with the lack of adequate mass-media alternatives have supercharged cult recruitment in the last approximately 10 years.

Stupid people in my life have been continually and recklessly joining harebrained cults for the last 5 years.

Really I think it's probably much, much easier to start a cult these days than it has ever been. Good news for tech company founders I guess, bad news for American culture, American society, and the American people.


One way to help stop it is to get off social media and stop giving these tech billionaires so much money.

The less people on social media, the less real the network effect is, the less people who join in the first place, the less money the billionaires have to throw hundreds of millions into politics, the less inadvertent cult members.

I've gotten to the point where I just leave my phone at home at this point, and it has been incredibly nice. Before that I deleted most apps that I found to be time wastes, deleted all social media (HN and two small discords are my exception).

It's very nice, I'm less stressed, I feel more in the moment, I respond to my friends when I check my phone every few hours on the speaker in the other room.

I encourage others to try it, add it to your dry January.

And ya know what I ain't doing a lick of? Sending money and reams of data to these billionaires I think are really lame individuals with corrupted moral compasses.

Now it ain't perfect, I'm sure Google's still getting reams of info about me from my old Gmail account that I still use sometimes, and Apple too from a few sources. But... getting closer!

So many folk sit here and recognize the same problems I do, the way it warps your attention, the addictiveness of the handheld devices, the social media echo chambers, the rising influence of misinformation, the lack of clarity between real and fake...

Seems like there's a solution in front of us :-)


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: