It's just some C# loops, and scanning the DOM for 'a' tags, and then analysing the 'href' attribute on them, and if there's a match, put it in the array. What I wanted to share was the methodology I used to solve the problem.
Nothing like Briggs and Riley! Not a lot of their competitors offer lifetime warranties, but they do. They have replacement components, so you can fix a broken wheel instead of tossing the bag and starting from scratch.
Find an attorney. Don’t give us any updates. Consider deleting this. This posting could be considered legally discoverable. Not hard to figure out who you are from your submission history. Best of luck.
Because he said something at all. Though, HN is probably not akw hanging fruit for anything. Unless your founder is here and knows you are. Or if you re-use that username then when they look for your social media they will find it.
Hey, for the benefit of the community, can you give an idea of what sort of stuff is practically available/discoverable to people like yourself? maybe a link to a white paper, or even just best practice recommendations for people who want to have an online presence (FB/reddit/github/HN/etc comments + likes, tor or torrent use, google searches, amazon orders, alexa/siri, email/calls/texts, etc... not illegal use, just perhaps colorful) but not get screwed over in personal/professional cases? do amazon/google/reddit/etc provide records if subpoena'd, or can you just see what's kept on my local machine/phone?
They'll attempt to find a mis-statement, a slip up of any kind that doesn't jive with any part of the rest of the picture / claim in question. They may look at the post for anything negative directed at a given person or the company, or slander generally (eg second line from end). Even if it's a stretch. From there it's a short hop to tossing around a few legal threats to end or substantially complicate the entire thing for most people on the other side.
You're right - I can't see anything that would possibly prejudice his case.
While it's typical for lawyers to instruct clients "don't say a word" - making it easier for them to control the narrative - in this instance, it's entirely unnecessary.
In other contexts, I'd go further and say it might even be risky to do so, given there are laws around deleting/preserving evidence when litigation is anticipated.
Here, though, it's just a fairly innocuous request for advice.
Isn't it too bad that he doesn't name names? Isn't that what reputation should mean, that we fear having it tarnished by our bad behavior? If victims aren't even willing to go that far, then why believe them?
This frustration is why Korg sold so many Minilogues last year.
Check out this Minilogue review playlist by Marc Doty of Automatic Gainsay. You can see what's happening on the oscilloscope while he's explaining things.
Now i'm looking at ableton live wondering: where's an instrument/vst as simple as that thing? There are endless "instruments" with weird knobs and then there's effects and whatever. Is Live the wrong tool if i just want to create a nice sound and then record something and then put some tracks together?
In the UK it’s not unusual for the head of a local council (running a city or a county) to make more than the PM. University chancellors make even more.
Yes but pay for both is a topic of frequent controversy. Does anyone really think it's harder to find a university chancellor, or that it requires more skill and time, than being prime minister? Or is it the result of correspondingly greater monitoring and accountability on politician's salaries vs the essentially unaccountable university system?
Do you think you will share the code on github or something similar? Great writeup.