Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | hermanzegerman's commentslogin

You mean like the Article in the Flagship Publication of German Public Broadcasting about terrorist suspects, naming their nationality?

https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/regional/bayern/br-dingolfi...

So please provide an example for your argument. Because right now it's "Trust me Bro, I'm a Lawyer"


[flagged]


The Question was wether it was illegal to put the Nationality in the Article, and you comment completely missed the point

Who do you think you are to believe yourself so important that dictate what can be talked about, German? What is wrong with you? Did you not read what I wrote? Stop throwing yourself off the other side of the cliff out of spite, 80 years after your society was pushed to throw itself off the cliff!

Talking about "missing the point"? One instance of the clear backpedaling about mentioning nationality/ethnicity in regime propaganda outlets is cited in order to act as if it has not been decades of abusive shielding of evil, harm, and crime against the indigenous peoples of Europe. What are you even doing, acting contrary to your own survival, German?

It's a typical abusive, narcissistic action; a kind of narcissistic evasion when the manipulation, toxicity, lies, and abuse lose effect and "admitted" at least to oneself; which if immediately followed with not only pleading of leniency, reasonableness, and moderation; but also immediate further abuse through your type of nitpicking and tone policing, with accusations of unreasonable response or things like "not letting it go". It's a common and core indicator of the depraved mind of the narcissistic personality disorder and derangement.... "You are wrong, but if you are right then you didn't say the words right and immediately need to forgive and allow me to further abuse and manipulate or you are the bad one". It's sick and depraved. Stop behaving that way, all of you.

It will simply not end well, regardless of what you think, tell yourself, or try to lie and gaslight others with. Either the abuse and denial that rises to genocide by the UN and EU definition, through the denial of the very abuse being perpetrated will continue and the indigenous people and all their cultures and traditions that have been around for centuries and millennia will be eradicated and you will end up with a similarly corrupted and rotten society like the USA; or it will end in a backlash in Europe after the abuses just accumulate, people snap and there is an explosion that of course comes form it. You can only abuse so much and so long unless you totally kill your victims... your own culture, your own people, Europe as a whole, yourself even.

History and reality does not care what fanatical and fantastical illusions some of us hold about how everyone can live happily ever after...at gunpoint at other people's expenses. It is not possible that it will end well without total destruction and eradication of a whole civilization's culture and history again, like was done in France, Russia, and China through the communist mental pestilence. These are not difficult things to understand or predict, especially since they have happened several times now in history. Yet so many seem unable to understand or see the clear path to the invariable consequences.


"Who do you think you are to believe yourself so important that dictate what can be talked about"

Are you aware of the strawman concept?

Who here said they want to dictate what can be talked about?


[flagged]


Or their number is the same, but destroyed minds have more reach now and are just more visible than before?

The Internet has given mental illness a megaphone and (often) income.

[flagged]


[flagged]


Someone said to you, "get well soon". Can you provide a rational argument, how you concluded from that single statement, that the person has a medical condition of a narcissist?

I always thought, diagnosing takes more effort and data points. But I also think the HN guidelines discourage commenting in an "engaged state".


I've never seen Zivver used in German Healthcare.

Also Germany uses and is already Rolling out a Matrix-based Messenger and S/MIME-Mail with End-to-End-Encryption for Communication between Healthcare Professionals.

So at least for Germany this is not a problem.

More problematic was our prior health Minister who wanted to make data accessibile to OpenAI et al for "research". That's also why I opted out of the electronic health record

https://www.heise.de/news/Lauterbach-zu-Gesundheitsdaten-Goo...


I don’t think you can opt out of the electronic health record long term. We should instead elect officials that can deal with the “Neuland” of the digital age and have some technical chops and don’t immediately cave in when there is some money to be made (in no way implying that you don’t already do this)

Right now, you can and should do it.

See https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/themen/digitalis...

> We should instead elect officials that can deal with the “Neuland” of the digital age and have some technical chops and don’t immediately cave in when there is some money to be made

Yes, but I don't think this will happen during our lifetimes. Especially since the Gematik has shown again and again that they can't be trusted with it


>I've never seen Zivver used in German Healthcare.

How would you even be sure of this just from what you can see from the outside? That doesn't mean your health insurance company isn't using Zivver internally same how they use Office 365 or SAP. It's not like they tell you all the SW they use.


Why would they use it internally?

Internally, you have the Hospital Information System where you can look up all the informations you need.

I can just say I know the inside of one of Germany's biggest Hospitals, since I'm a Doctor. And requesting Patient Data or giving it out to other Parties is unfortunately a Task that Doctors still have to do on their own

And for communication with the outside world it's down to Fax, Phone or Letter.

And that will be replaced with KIM in the future


> Fax, Phone or Letter

That's interesting because in The Netherlands most of my doctor's communications come through email (and zivver), followed by snail mail.


Theoretically they could already send this via S/MIME encrypted Mail (KIM) to the family doctor, but most Hospitals haven't rolled out this service yet.

They just started installing Card Readers for the Doctor Identity Cards, so they can issue electronic prescriptions

For communication with Patients some Hospitals have Web Portals/Apps for getting/sending information.


That's pretty interesting. We have electronic prescriptions too (though it goes straight to the pharmacy however - we don't see it).

As far as I know, I don't think the hospital portal has ever been used for communication like that. An email seems more "obvious" perhaps to the docs, and that's what they use most of the time.


The Hospitals in NL that use Epic as EHR also have Patient Portals. But I don't know how much they get used

https://www.umcutrecht.nl/en/login-patient-portal


There is a successor to SciHub which relies on IPFS

You mean Nexus?

Yes. Its not perfect, but it has a decent coverage

Why do they need to identify you for a domestic flight anyway?

In Europe I don't need to show ID for flights inside the Schengen Area. You go through security, they check your luggage and it's done.

There is no legitimate reason for the government to identify you on a domestic flight


Right, and the reason this has been going on for nearly a quarter century in the USA is because it was widely considered an unconstitutional national passport until 9-11, and got bipartisan push-back from a number of states following its passage.

The federal government passed it along with the authoritarian wishlists various agencies had been salivating over for 40+ years and unable to get passed, until under the guise of saving us from the 'terrorists', who now 25 years later, turned out the actual terrorists were probably just domestic authoritarians. The guys living in caves weren't really a threat and could be dealt with, without passing a bunch of stuff to affect every single citizen of the country.


Edit: disregard this if you're talking specifically about showing ID at security checkpoints (instead of at boarding).

> In Europe I don't need to show ID for flights inside the Schengen Area.

What countries are you traveling between?

I've flown at least a dozen times between Portugal and Spain or France the past few years and they've checked my ID in both directions each time.

It's also required to at least carry ID (presumably because it may be checked): https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/travel/entry-exit/eu-c...

"As an EU national, you have the right to travel freely in the 27 EU member countries as well as in Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland (non-EU countries but members of the Schengen area) carrying either a valid passport or a national identity card (ID card)."


Switzerland to Italy, Switzerland to Portugal.

The French illegally checked everyone passports on Arrival when I Flew to Corsica once, but I don't expect much from them with all their "Plan Vigipirate" Bullshit which is also just about reducing freedom under the guise of "Protection against Terrorism".

Also Germany isn't much better right now with their also illegal border controls.

Right-Wing-Populism destroys many nice things

>It's also required to at least carry ID (presumably because it may be checked)

That's true, but for Schengen Flights you don't have to go through a government passport control like you have to do for international flights.

Airlines ask for ID sometimes because they make some money off it (to avoid people reselling tickets, charging for correcting misspelled names etc...), but they are not required to.

https://www.mdr.de/nachrichten/deutschland/panorama/fliegen-...


Last time I flew from Spain they only checked at the gate (which I didn't expect).

Also, most of these countries demand that you have an ID with you at all times outside. Yeah I don't do it either, because where I live is full of pickpockets and a new ID card means travelling for hours to the capital and paying 180€. I'm from Holland and they don't support their citizens abroad well. They even closed all the consulates to save money, as if they're a piss poor country :) Even most poor countries have money for consulates. But if you're a business owner they still have a contact in every city. Stupid neoliberals.


> Last time I flew from Spain they only checked at the gate (which I didn't expect)

But that was the Airline and not the Government I suppose.


"We need your id to put your name on the passenger manifest"

"The manifest is required by law"

"We can't just put your possibly-fake name on the manifest because then we'd be committing a crime"

Combinations of other rules probably effectively require it, even if nonsensical.


Schengen thing should be working like this but more and more I have been asked for ID/passport, usually by the airline before boarding or local police acting as border guards after arrival.


>>In Europe I don't need to show ID for flights inside the Schengen Area

Really? I fly between Schengen countries multiple times a year. I don't remember one where I wasn't required to show my ID at both check-in and then gates. There are even ID scanners at the gates.

Driving licence doesn't count as ID either. It's either passport or official government ID card.


I flew multiple times with easyJet in the last years, and I never had to show my ID at the security checkpoints. Sometimes the easyJet agent at the gate wanted to see an ID, but this is done on behalf of the company, not the government.

The only time they ask for ID at the Check-In-Counter, is when you have checked luggage.

Here is an article by German Public Television that confirms there is no legal requirement for the Airline to check, except in Spain https://www.mdr.de/nachrichten/deutschland/panorama/fliegen-...


>>The only time they ask for ID at the Check-In-Counter, is when you have checked luggage.

They ask you to show it no matter if you have checked luggage or not. Your can online check-in but then you need to provide your ID info online.

The point is you're not getting a boarding pass without an ID and then you're not getting through security without a boarding pass and then most likely you're not getting on the plane without both.

>>but this is done on behalf of the company, not the government.

It's true. Is it an important distinction though? Government knows who is flying anyway as proved by multiple arrests on arrival in European airports.


No, some airlines don't bother checking your ID during Check-In and it's legal. So you are able to get an Boarding Pass without an ID. If I remember correctly easyJet also didn't ask for ID Information on Schengen Flights during the online Check-In

See https://www.mdr.de/nachrichten/deutschland/panorama/fliegen-...


Maybe they're talking specifically about the security checkpoints, rather than the other 2 places where ID gets checked.

Maybe we're moving checkpoints instead of goalposts.


Nobody uses WhatsApp Business in Germany, Austria or Switzerland in a way that you would be stuck without


Then they would just use another Messenger or fall back on RCS/SMS.

The only reason WhatsApp is so popular, is because so many people are on it, but you have all you need (their phone number) to contact them elsewhere anyway


> When I see that it is widely accepted that ApoB is better to measure than LDL-C, but the industry continues to measure LDL-C, but not ApoB, I wonder why.

That's pretty simple to explain. No conspiracy.

LDL-C is much much cheaper to measure. ApoB costs 36x times as much, so Insurance Companies don't like to pay for it


> LDL-C is much much cheaper to measure. ApoB costs 36x times as much, so Insurance Companies don't like to pay for it

Unfortunately American retail prices might as well be generated by a PRNG, and do not mean much.

On Ulta, a basic lipid panel vs an ApoB test are $22 and $36 respectively. Looking at Indian lab prices, (approx. INR->USD), both are under $10 there.

https://www.ultalabtests.com/test/cholesterol-and-lipids-tes... https://www.ultalabtests.com/test/cardio-iq-apolipoprotein-b...


CarPlay always felt pretty rubbish compared to the integrated BMW System to me, which just gets the job done. But I also just want to have Navigation and Music during driving


No it isn't. If the cheap SSD inside has reached it's write limit it's a paperweight


For an average user the SSD will never reach its write limit though. But I agree, SSD's should be always user-replaceable.


You really come off as a Hardcore Apple Fanboy

> Its not only the Pros, no "high-end" laptop running Windows or Linux with just 8GB of RAM can perform better than a MacBook Air with 8GB

Doesn't matter because for the equivalent price you can load up your non-Apple Machine with RAM to the Max, same with SSD Storage. With a MacBook you would need to prepare to cough up, up to 9k more than the base model for a huge SSD and RAM. No more than 1k for this elsewhere

> ve been using Arch Linux daily for the past month or two, and it's great. However, there isn't a day that passes without screen freezes during peak usage, and I need to reboot every day or two.

I don't need to reboot for Weeks, I'm using Fedora though. It sounds like you're doing something terribly wrong, as most Linux Users also don't need to reboot ever 1-2 days. Maybe you should try a more beginner friendly distro if Arch is too complex for you


I use WebStorm, CLion, Cursor, 2-3 Claude Code instances, Chrome/Brave with 50+ tabs, Docker, and a bunch of other things on MacBook Air all at the same time. It works. Never freezes. Never crashes. I tried that on Windows recently, and now on Arch with a lot more memory (32), and it simply can't handle it. I reboot daily. Freezes in the middle of the work. It may be the issue with nvidia drivers as other pointed out, but that's precisely my point. Apple has very limited number of drivers to maintain, and they can improve them to perfection. They are not perfect, of course, but compared to alternatives, it's light-years ahead.


I also use a MacBook as my daily driver, but have used different ThinkPads for years and there is no way that that workload should bring any medium specced TP to its knees like you're describing.


Good to know. Many people recommend ThinkPads, but my experience has been with Dell. In the future, I might consider a ThinkPad or a Framework laptop.


I use Dell at work, Thinkpad at home. Either gets the job done, but to me it's clear Thinkpads have superior quality, at least if you don't go for the cheapest model. Keyboard and battery life are so much better on my old Thinkpad compared to 2 years newer Dell of same price range.


Ollama crashed my MacBook just last week, they definitely crash, as they might not have created the “report this application” feature if they didn’t.


I don’t know for sure, I need to confirm it, but it feels like my similarly specced Arch machine would just shrug at it. It’s a 10 years old PC, yet it feels like it’s a non issue for it to handle this. I bet my MacBook Pro from 2014 (with Arch too) won’t even start a fan. It depends on these 50 tabs, I guess, but the rest is just doesn’t feel like a big deal to handle.


I dunno I use similar apps on my work-provided 32GB M1 Pro and that thing chugs along horribly after a certain point. I still get the spinning beach ball from time to time, and the massive work Vue codebase in Webstorm is so fucking slow that it can take upwards of 10 seconds for type intellisense to give me results in tiny files, with constant freezing. The same doesn't happen on my personal linux machines, my work codebase is incredibly speedy there.

Don't get me started on MacOS itself and its myriad of problems.


My 10 year old ThinkPad can handle RStudio,PyCharms, VSCode with Copilot Agent and Firefox with 30+ Tabs open just fine on 32 GB RAM and Fedora.

Again, I don't think the issue here is Linux itself


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: