Immigration is a small part of the issue for sure, but in the UK it was Thatcherism and the legacy of it which did in the high trust. Plus it was a country of half full of pirates and thieves anyway.
I feel like you believe this comment to be incredibly revealing and profound but to an outsider it’s almost indistinguishable from meaningless noise, and so you’re serving to highlight the very problem of defining what you believe you have defined.
What about the “quantum holography” part? Do you see how a hyperdimensionality of quantum potential, which is merely not presently well understood may be crudely explained as a holographic sieve?
We “cast the shadows” of our mind through this holographic sieve, maintained as many electrochemically sustained clusters. It is the disposition of these competing and interacting holographic potentials which drive our thoughts and interests, not switchboards of Boolean logics.
I am suggesting our neurons clustering, both physically and virtually through layers of isolated potentials are combined as a holographic surface. Their wave fronts are bound in the disparate lattice of the mind, at that time synchronized.
I suggest through all of this that manipulating quantum holographic memory is the future of computation, and that is exactly what our minds do, however crudely.
I’m arguing about what might sensibly be communicated in a short forum post without descending into nonsense, not what one might find acceptable to believe or think.
I’m sure there is parable out there relating to abject dismissal without consideration where conventions and pretenses are not made.
I’m just that guy posting on the internet sure.
If you were to try again, from consideration of this thread so far, other than “science hasn’t proved these things are truth for me”, and acknowledging that I am not the first source you have heard these things from, only in this composed format.
Let’s take Penrose being booed from “scientific credibility” for suggesting something similar, only I have specific objections to Penrose’s conjecture.
Firstly, gravity does not collapse the super amplitude, there is a chaotic firefly in every particle that can be tamed and manipulated with presently incomprehensible precision. I call this “quantum holography” and I predict the qubit will be a dead end (as basis for quantum computation) within …20 years. I should say 10, yet who knows who gets liquidated or canceled.
Others have proposed the microtubules as the 2D crystalline latis for this mass (billions of atoms”) to act as one surface for the coupling/entanglement (which are two different things.)
Besides electrochemical “state machines” we are potential amplitude driven determiners of resolve.
My response is that you read like you smoke a lot of marijuana and aren’t making great sense to other people. I know what you’re talking about - the various topics you are talking about - but you’re not creating any kind of argument and one sentence barely flows into the other.
Huge numbers based on the forum posts on my investment app. Literally Christmas for companies offering long leverage and CFD products. A few “survivorship bias” type people managed to put in a short at the $120 top of silver and accidentally made a killing and this weekend will be believing they are prophetic genii.
With AI they can dispense with thinking too. And with an Optimus robot they won’t even have to go to the store or leave the lay-z-boy, raw unprocessed beef fat can just be shovelled into their unthinking and illiterate mouths every waking hour by the droid.
Hah, there's a dystopian short story to be written there, where a regime says "These people who never got born would've voted for us, so we're counting their votes. We thank the voting population for the landslide victory and continued trust in us to govern them!"..
Maybe we can ask the Supreme Court and the MAGA party what the plot of the story should be..
Yeah the present has turned into a mashup of Wall-E, Idiocracy, Inifnite Jest, Back to the Future 2 with some ideas from Neal Stephenson borrowed by the tech bros who think they’re cultured.
I don't see how it's "shitty." It portrays a usage of ChatGPT that I imagine is becoming pretty typical. People are treating "AI" as an oracle. The situation isn't helped by corporate heads and LLM boosters blathering on about how AI is soon going to replace most of the workforce, boost productivity by a gazillion percent, and cure cancer.
reply