Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | finiteseries's commentslogin

That’s about the Western US, some of which are flyover states, but most flyover states exist east of the 100th meridian and are generally more at risk to flooding than desertification!


Okay sorry I used the wrong term, not flyover states but western US states. Tucson seems to be affected by precisely this drought problem.


They absolutely are, anybody relying on the Colorado River and its compact are at risk, ie the southwestern US and Denver but particularly the southern division states like California and Arizona.

Was slightly worried to hear people thinking Ohio is at any risk of desertification is all :)


The western states are for sure the most fun to fly over, though.


By maxing out supply amid unending demand, they have a terrific product/market fit.

https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pet_pnp_unc_dcu_nus_m.htm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supply_and_demand

Here’s a map of the places that create diesel from crude oil. Note the north & south east where these shortages are occurring, and limited to.

https://atlas.eia.gov/datasets/6547eda91ef84cc386e23397cf834...

It has been 45 years since a >200,000 barrel per day refinery was built in the US.

1998-2015 saw 0 upgrades to existing capacity or new builds. Since 2015, a handful of <50,000 barrel per day refineries have been built, but every single one is in Texas.


Meanwhile, on a cloud gaming service that has already taken off:

A native Xbox Series X test running at 60Hz gets an 85ms average - from a trigger pull to the first flash of gunfire. Xbox is far off a native PC result, which comes in at just 49ms. And the big surprise is that GeForce Now using the PC app beats a local Xbox Series X in latency, coming in at 81.7ms - while a Shield test is comparable to Xbox at 86ms.

https://www.eurogamer.net/digitalfoundry-2022-geforce-now-rt...

It will never cease to amaze me how consistently far behind HN’s user base is on this topic, the average 20 something service worker will watch a movie like Dune on an illegal streaming site through their cracked phone screen in 720p, but we’re actually entertaining the idea non-PC native latency is a requirement for playing video games without spending >$500-$3k.

The market for these services is slightly larger and more diverse than the folks currently running 4K@144hz setups.


> It will never cease to amaze me how consistently far behind HN’s user base is on this topic

You will see the same bias when talking about game development, it is all about FOSS and portable APIs over here, when driking bears at GDC(E) it is all about IP, publisher deals, raw platform features, and who cares about the portability versus getting that deal that puts one on the spotlight.

The communities couldn't be further appart in culture.


This is a really good way to describe the argument for cloud gaming! Easy to forget that space is large


It was okay, but solidly last gen. Stadia was always limited to 1080p@60hz, upscaling to 4K at max bitrate of ~45Mbps.

Getting the new MBP actually pushed me to GeForce Now at the time which can hit true 4k@120hz and stream at native Mac resolutions with eg ray tracing in Cyberpunk 2077 now up to 70Mbps, I highly recommend trying it out if you’re still interested in cloud gaming, the difference is quite drastic.


You cannot get a 16” 1600p @ 120hz laptop for anything less than double the cost of that $700 model.

The specs are very specific to gaming, and anything similar (1440p@120hz) will include the cost of the hardware required for local gaming.


It’s an entirely adequate substitute if you don’t base your export dependent economy on cheap Russian gas, and heat your homes with it during winter at the same time, see: East Asia.

Never commit two crimes at the same time.


Or you could just not join in on a US proxy war whose only objective is to weaken Russia. Pretty rich criticizing Europe for relying on cheap Russian gas when the US economy would collapse overnight if OPEC, or even just the Saudis and a few others boycotted it.


If an independent geopolitical position had been charted at quite literally any point over the past however many decades, that may have been an option, yes.

Mexico alone provides more crude oil to the US than Russia and Saudi Arabia combined, it is 2022, not 2001.

https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/oil-and-petroleum-produc...

Neither of those countries pose an existential threat to the North American equivalent of Northern & Eastern Europe (who may take issue with a lack of enthusiasm in weakening Russia) either.


That graphic needs to be updated to reflect an entirely different new world, it’s from 2016, the same year the US lifted a 40 year old ban on oil & gas exports.

It’s now the largest LNG exporter in the world in 2022, though that hardly benefits the country directly in terms of making a pretty penny.


> LNG

LNG only accounts for a small portion of the EU natural gas imports, most of their gas is imported in gaseous form.

Main extra-EU partners for imports of natural gas, 2021:

    Russia: 39.2%
    Norway: 25.1%
    Algeria: 8.2%
    United States: 7.3%  <-- The one you're blaming.
    United Kingdom: 6.5%
All natural gas import, LNG and gaseous combined, only account for 24.9% of EU energy imports. In 2021, 61.8% of EU energy imports were crude oil.

Main extra-EU partners for imports of petroleum oil, 2021:

    Russia: 24.8%
    Norway 9.4%
    United States: 8.8%  <-- The one you're blaming.
    Libya: 8.2%
    Kazakhstan: 8.0%
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php...


EU imports of US LNG eclipsed monthly Russian pipeline output as recently as June.

These figures will be updated to reflect an entirely different new world. They’re from 2021, the year before Russia invaded Ukraine and Europe’s energy supply was dramatically changed at both ends.

Natural gas in the EU is generally used to heat homes and power industry, it and other sources of energy aren’t immediately fungible.

I don’t subscribe to realism and don’t personally blame anyone but Russia and the EU member energy policies responsible for this situation unlike the Russian sympathetic commenter you originally responded to, but using pre war figures on top of pre export ban statistics does border closely on disingenuity given how loudly and rapidly changes have been occurring in 2022.


Knock Russia off those lists and America still isn't close to the largest source of energy imported by the EU. Even for somebody inclined to conspiracy beliefs, why blame the US instead of Norway? Because he has a grudge against America, obviously.


- The last thousand some years (in Europe)

- Widespread (in Europe)

- Half of recorded (European) history

An exclusively European phenomenon, the bulk of which came and went while it was a backwater region with limited effect on the rest of the world.


> An exclusively European phenomenon, the bulk of which came and went while it was a backwater region with limited effect on the rest of the world.

Weird that it had limited effect on the rest of the world, since basically history from now back to about the 15th century represents a European hegemony, now a US hegemony that extends European Western philosophy to the world.

Seems that "limited effect" is pretty big. So much so that we're /literally discussing it now in 2022/.


The bulk of feudalism took place between the 5th and 12th centuries, ~400 years before 1491.


Sure, and the legacy of feudalism is a core part of what informs Western philosophy and political structure since then.


Yes. Its post 1492* relevance through its legacy now established, we revolve back to the point:

- The last thousand some years (in Europe)

- Widespread (in Europe)

- Half of recorded (European) history

You may have misread my original comment, the “limited effect” was to describe Europe’s influence at that particular point in time, not feudalism/Europe’s influence since then.


Always avoid using the main nitter.net instance, it’s slow even in DE.

If you’re in the US, try https://nttr.stream/ulturaltutor/status/1553472360434515973



Its performance is unparalleled among cloud gaming services at the moment with the updates over the past year or so, Stadia is now a blurry, poorly upscaled mess in comparison, often locked at 30-45fps for certain titles while GFN is pushing real 4K at 120FPS with full ray tracing etc without breaking a sweat.

https://youtu.be/B1bIGi1yjC8

It will routinely outperform a local series x (nevermind a PS5) given the right conditions, but that’s subject to your ISP, location, and probably not running CP2077 at maxed out ultra RTX graphics settings just yet.


It was their streaming tech though that wasn't as good, rather than their rending of graphics as it was just a blurry mess and laggy.

Will give it another try.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: