Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | evanriley's commentslogin

> Gah, just when you think you can trust time.nist.gov

You still can...

If you're that considered about 5 microseconds: Build your own Stratum 1 time server https://github.com/geerlingguy/time-pi

or just use ntppool https://www.ntppool.org/en/


It sounds like GPS, and thus a GPS-based stratum 1 server, uses these time servers, but they were successfully failed over:

> Jeff finished off the email mentioning the US GPS system failed over successfully to the WWV-Ft. Collins campus. So again, for almost everyone, there was zero issue, and the redundancy designed into the system worked like it's supposed to.

So failures in these systems are potentially correlated.

The author mentions another solution. Apparently he runs his own atomic clock. I didn’t know this was a thing an individual could do.

> But even with multiple time sources, some places need more. I have two Rubidium atomic clocks in my studio, including the one inside a fancy GPS Disciplined Oscillator (GPSDO). That's good for holdover. Even if someone were jamming my signal, or my GPS antenna broke, I could keep my time accurate to nanoseconds for a while, and milliseconds for months. That'd be good enough for me.


The CSACs that I have in a couple devices are 'atomic', and use Rubidium, but they're a bit lower accuracy than Cesium clocks [1] or Hydrogen Masers [2].

There are a few folks on the time-nuts mailing list who own such exotic pieces of hardware, but those are pretty far out of reach for most!

[1] https://www.microchip.com/en-us/products/clock-and-timing/co...

[2] https://www.microchip.com/en-us/products/clock-and-timing/co...


Atomic clocks cover a pretty big range of performance nowadays. You can pick up a used but serviceable rubidium frequency reference for a few hundred dollars but the difference between it and the top of the line clocks is almost as big as the difference between a it and a good pendulum clock.


Be aware that there are members of the NTP pool with less-than-honorable intentions and you don't get to pick-and-choose. Yes, they all should provide the time, but they also get your IP address.

For example: unlike the IPv4 space, the IPv6 space is too big too scan, so a number of "researchers" (if you want to call them that) put v6-capable NTP servers in the NTP pool to gather information about active v6 blocks to scan/target.


Do you have any acticles or references about this? That would be great research (pun intended) to find out


Is this one of those extraordinary claims that requires evidence? Or is it generally true that there are homey-pots in many of these services (NTP, mirrors, etc)


I’ll second SponsorBlock. Not sure I could watch most YouTube videos without it.


You're not missing anything. This is how every company has taken advantage of rising inflation and now tariffs.


Shareholders demand it, even. If your costs increased but your profits stayed constant after your price increase, then a small business owner might be perfectly happy with that. But it's a decline in profit margin so investors would go ballistic.


Safari has a set list of search engines, you cannot add to or remove from the list.

They currently "support" safari currently by redirecting the searches that go to your chosen search engine to kagi.com with an extension.


And Kernel level anti-cheat isn't stopping them.


Are you pretending that Starlinks upfront cost of $599 and $120/mo is affordable for the community that this article is about?


$120 per month is well within the range of most monthly internet plans. The article doesn't say how much monthly service for this county-driven initiative will cost. Yes, there's an upfront cost (though cable providers typically have a hookup too) but it's not huge in comparison to monthly fees.


I'd consider paying that much for 10gpbs, but nothing less.


That's nice for you.

We got starlink for our rural property. We were previously paying over $200 a month for vastly inferior service (long range Wi-Fi), much slower and dropped out all the time.

If you can get a wired connection, get it. Starlink is for people who can't, and it's far and away the best option for those people.


If you have better/cheaper options, by all means take them. Many people do not so it's pay that or do without.


Some people, but I very much doubt most.


I wrote "many." And, yes, many people do not have good wired Internet access and paying a relatively small premium to get the equivalent of wired broadband access at all is worth it for a great many of those people. No one is asking you to pay if you have better options.


You don't need any enterprise hardware to use taildrop.

> - "Taildrop is only available on Synology with Tailscale v1.18.2".

> - "Currently that means you need to manually install Tailscale on your Synology NAS."

Only apply if you're installing it ON Synology hardware, otherwise it is matter of installing the tailscale client and opting your network in.


Why do anything if there is already someone doing it?


After seeing this happen time and time again, it's kind of a wild decision to make. So many negative reviews I see these days are about performance issues.

You would think a little more time would be put into reaching at least some reasonable performance level.


> So many negative reviews I see these days are about performance issues.

Unfortunately, negative publicity from bad performance doesn't really stop these games from selling well, as proven by most AAA releases in the past few years.


Skylines isn't an AAA release though. And the first game was only really successful because the prior sim city was full of user hostile changes. The new game similarly banks on the accumulated positive image of the first one. To risk all that with a user hostile, awfully optimized early release is a risky game to play.

The studio already killed a series once with a bad second entry, cities in motion 2...


From what I understand...they don't. Everyone that I know who participated in online dating mostly just gave up on it.


That's strange, from my point of view it seems that nobody meets in real life any more, almost everyone seems to have met on Hinge


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: