Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | epgui's commentslogin

The point is I don’t want my TV, my refrigerator, my toaster, my dishwasher, or my washing machine to be “smart” or to have any AI or internet connectivity.

These all have a very simple job to do, and there’s absolutely zero value-add to the smart edge software nonsense.


I may want sometimes to use my TV for watching something (I know, sounds wild), and I don’t want to buy additional piece of hardware for that.

Then go ahead? Not sure why you're so surprised that some of us don't like running spyware on our devices.

It's a gas in an open space, it diffuses very quickly.

Yep. When I had to fill CO2 tanks at a paintball shop yes there were times that I had to open a door (I mean we were talking a lot of fills in short time, btw fills had to start with draining the tank's existing volume so I could zero out the scale) but even indoors a door+fan was enough to keep even the nastiest of sale days OSHA compliant.

Also a 'puncture' is very different from the gasbag mysteriously vanishing from existence; My only other thought is that in cold regions (I saw wisconsin mentioned in the article) CO2 does not diffuse quite as fast and sometimes visibly so...


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limnic_eruption

I don't know the safety limits for this quantity, I hope the "70 meters" claim was by someone who modelled it carefully rather than a gut check.


Seems like it would depend if there was a small tear or a massive breach.

It also deflates pretty slowly. I'd guess any breeze would remove the hazard altogether.

> simply statements of affirmation about how much they hate AI

I wonder what that might mean!


You can property test most code.

Am I the only one who, rather than being impressed, is recoiling in horror?

I’m a senior engineer on a staff track, I am proud to ask “dumb” questions all the time, and I don’t want to work somewhere where I don’t feel safe pursuing knowledge openly and candidly.

It’s very unpleasant to read. I did find the article useful nonetheless.

There’s a nugget of an idea in there, even if I disagree with most of it.

But code doesn’t only need to be understood for maintenance purposes: code is documentation for business processes. It’s a thing that needs to be understandable and explainable by humans anytime the business process is important.

LLMs can never / should never replace verifiability, liability, or value judgment.


Agree with your point. It's going to be super interesting to see whether languages become more lower or higher on the stack. My guess is unuseful: both.

We've not really seen what impact this will have just yet.


At that point you may as well just do the work yourself.


What I‘m describing is probably a few minutes of exploring and writing a good prompt, vs what, 4h of CSS wrangling?


I don’t see how this should take more than a few minutes of css work.


Why? Just give it access to the playwright mcp server.


I‘m using this, works really well and doesn’t pollute context as much:

https://github.com/steipete/agent-scripts/blob/main/scripts/...


you could say that about anything…


I don't understand the point? You can say that about anything, and that's the whole reason why it's good that alternatives exist.

The clear target of this project is a k8s-like experience for people who are already familiar with Docker and docker compose but don't want to spend the energy to learn a whole new thing for low stakes deployments.


Uncloud is so far away from k8s, its not k8s like.

A normal person wouldn't think 'hey lets use k8s for the low stakes deployment over here'.


>A normal person wouldn't think 'hey lets use k8s for the low stakes deployment over here'.

I'm afraid I have to disappoint you


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: