Oh, yes, only "important" people deserve customer service. That is an appallingly elitist attitude.

Nobody said that.

Even mainstream gaming sites cannot review even a fraction of the mobile games market; you've created for yourself a truly Sisyphean task.

A better approach might be to highlight the fraction of mobile games that deserve more recognition for avoiding dark patterns, like this site does:

https://nobsgames.stavros.io/android/

Alternately, focus on AAA games.

I read the whole article, but have never tried the model. Looking at the input document, I believe the model saw enough of a space between the 14 and 5 to simply treat it that way. I saw the space too. Impressive, but it's a leap to say it saw 145 then used higher order reasoning to correct 145 to 14 and 5.

I also read the whole article, and this behaviour that the author is most excited about only happened once. For a process that inherently has some randomness about it, I feel it's too early to bit this excited.

Yep. A lot of things looked magical in the GPT-4 days. Eventually you realised it did it by chance and more often than not gets it wrong

I always wondered if there was some genetic factor related to mutations, perhaps, that was stronger in dogs than cats, horses, cows, sheep, etc. There's such morphological variety.

If I my retirement was tied up with some startup trying to IPO, I'd be furious. It's the exact opposite of responsible stewardship.

They just said shareholder

Smug blogger visits foreign country for a few days, finds evidence of his pre-existing belief system.

I mean, betterhelp would probably be an improvement over counseling via hallucinating AI.

Good. Too many game companies are running unregulated casinos aimed at minors with their lootboxes and pay to win mechanics.

They are not the government and should not have this vast, unaccountable monopoly power with no accountability and no customer service.

the government probably shouldn't either?

At least the government is normally elected.

Most of it kind of isn't. When was the last election for FCC commissioners or US Attorney General or federal district court judges?

The government tends to get out of their way to have accountability and customer service.

That's valid in regards to one's own company (excluding options, etc.), but to avoid longterm investing in the most dynamic sector with outsized returns is pennywise, pound foolish as the saying goes.

Avoid entirely != Account for existing risk

The arguably-opposite extreme would be the folks afraid of losing their job to "AI", so they double down on investing in certain tech stocks.