You’re mistaking a shortcut for a skill.

Calculators didn’t make people better at math — they made math vanish from the average mind. Spellcheck didn’t improve spelling — it bred autocorrect addicts. And now Cluely doesn’t make people smarter — it makes them dependent.

You’re not building intelligence. You’re building the illusion of intelligence, draped over atrophied minds too distracted to notice their muscles no longer move.

You say we won’t need to memorize, write, or think — but who understands what they’ve never wrestled with?

A prompt is not a thought. An answer is not an idea. And being "right" in real time is not the same as knowing why.

If the future belongs to the one who asks the best question, then God help us if no one remembers how to wonder without help.

Seems hilariously easy to detect tho. Just like in live conversation, when someone appears to be bullshitting their way through it... You casually drop some plausible nonsense and the con artist will show their hand by improvising on the plausibility instead of calling it out.

This article aims not for readers to merely absorb information; it's about experiencing the process of paying attention, which ties directly into the message. The style embodies the substance. The deliberate pacing, repetition, and reflective tone mirror the very practice it's encouraging. The text invites the reader to slow down, pay attention to each concept, and let them unfold naturally, step by step—much like how the author advises living life.

Similar to knolling, it methodically arranges ideas and concepts in an orderly way, encouraging the reader to appreciate each in its own space. The writing is intentionally uncluttered, asking the reader to focus on the essentials, without rushing through or trying to grasp everything at once.

The writing itself serves as an exercise in mindfulness, requiring the reader to approach it with the same careful attention that the author advocates for in life.