Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ednxzu's commentslogin

Infomaniak | Multiple Positions | Geneva, Switzerland | On-Site(up to 2 days remote/week)

Infomaniak is a leading Swiss web hosting and cloud services provider, committed to open source development, environmental sustainability, and robust privacy protection.

Positions:

- Senior SRE - Cloud (openstack) https://www.infomaniak.com/en/about/career/senior-sre-cloud-...

- Senior SRE - Storage https://www.infomaniak.com/en/about/career/senior-sre-storag...

- Senior SRE - Kubernetes https://www.infomaniak.com/en/about/career/senior-sre-kubern...

- Senior SRE - Database https://www.infomaniak.com/en/about/career/senior-sre-databa...

Fluency in French and English is *required*. All salaries are north of 120k CHF


Considering you run already run these zerotier networks, I would assume you heard of it, but since I don't see it mentioned and you (for obvious reasons) don't like tailscale, have you heard/used headscale (the opensource implementation of the controller(hosted) for tailscale) ?


yeah.

i know we can self host zerotier and headscale but i feel like i am invested in the zerotier network and i don't want to try another thing.


> the tech elite ( or more like the money elite controlling tech ) started talking about minority, lgbt and women's 'rights', they all started censoring, deplatforming, oppressing.

That's an entirely different issue tho, a private company regulating its own product has nothing to do with a gov trying to restrict internet access to its citizens.


> That's an entirely different issue tho, a private company regulating its own product has nothing to do with a gov trying to restrict internet access to its citizens.

That's my point. A private company regulating its own product is fine as long as it is private and independent. My point is that all 'private' companies appear to be following the same script which isn't something we'd expect from private independent companies. What's strange is that someone flipped a switch and all private companies, both political parties and government itself started behaving in the same manner. It's not just online censorship, it's the broad cultural campaign of chaos all under the banner of 'minority, lgbt and women's rights' mostly. Did every company in every industry from motorcycles to hollywood to news all magically decide to speak with one voice. Or is it that they were all directed to.

In china, it's obvious who is in charge. The communist party. They give orders, everyone follows. Who is giving orders to the our private companies, political parties and government?


This comment feels a little conspiracy theory-ish.

If a sufficiently big block of customers likes the idea of 'minority, lgbt and women's rights as you put it, they you're gonna see a bunch of companies trying to present themselves in a way that if favorable to that block.


> This comment feels a little conspiracy theory-ish.

Is conspiracy theory-ish code for true or obvious? Strange how 'conspiracy theory' ad hominems became popular recently.

> If a sufficiently big block of customers likes the idea of 'minority, lgbt and women's rights as you put it, they you're gonna see a bunch of companies trying to present themselves in a way that if favorable to that block.

Playing dumb I see. The country is majority christian and white. Using your logic, all commercials should be christian themed and advocate for whites.


>The country is majority christian and white.

the country, yes. The world demographic of people who use your product, no.

>all commercials should be christian themed and advocate for whites.

and many commercials aimed at an older audiience, e.g. cable TV, do focus on this. Are we also playing dumb on the generational gap in technology, demographics using online media, and their ideaology?


> the country, yes. The world demographic of people who use your product, no.

But the ads are target to the people in the country. Besides, the world at large is far more anti-lgbt, anti-women's rights and anti-woke than the bizarro world USA we've turned ourselves into. Are you seriously suggesting these companies are peddling pro-lgbt and women's rights propaganda advertisements to win over muslims, africans, indians, chinese, south americans, etc?

Crazy how when you refuse to accept reality, how you have to form insane contradictions after contradictions...

> and many commercials aimed at an older audiience, e.g. cable TV, do focus on this.

No they do not. That's the point.

> Are we also playing dumb on the generational gap in technology, demographics using online media, and their ideaology?

Who is talking about online media. Besides, even after insane brainwashing the younger generation isn't as 'woke' as you think they are. Sure, there are differences between generations, but people are ultimately people. But this has nothing to do with what we are talking about does it?

How dumb does one have to be to think that the american companies are creating lgbt ads for american audiences to win over saudis?


I'm not American, nor do I live in America, so my understanding of US culture is far from perfect, but from what I've seen it does appear that the vast majority of products, commercials and content in the US are aimed at white Christians. Pretty much everything I know from the USA is built around the primacy of white Christians.

You guys literally say "one nation under god", in the pledge of allegiance you say in schools and at the start of congressional sessions (according to wikipeida) and your money says "in god we trust" on it.


That's the marketplace of ideas, baby.


It is, until it isn't, and you don't want to put trust in the hands of a bunch of 70 y-o politicians to handle this.


It just is, the law specifies exactly under which law articles websites can be blocked, and all of said articles are quite specific about scamming, phishing, extortion of personal data, etc


Yes, but now you have established that the government is allowed to mandate such blocklists. The entire history of the world tells us that what is included in that blocklist will not remain as constrained as it currently is.


Laws are easier to add than revoke. Might be just for scam websites now (haven't checked your claim), but it's a single majority vote away for any website in the future that those in charge want to label as terrorist, propaganda, unethical, or whatever else the next group that comes to power finds as an excuse for information that is against their own agenda.


Depending how the law is implemented, it may only be a ministerial decision away.


https://github.com/hashicorp/vault/blob/main/LICENSE#L8-L11

Clearly states that you can use it in a production setup.


Thanks for pointing that out, so this must have been added by Hashicorp then.


That's the point of the BUSL. It defaults to non-production, use, but the licensor adds an Additional Use Grant that allows production use, which typically covers everything except competing with the licensor's cloud offering.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: