Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | davewasthere's commentslogin

The fact that there's an entire country mostly unaware of the utility and ubiquitousness of a simple electric kettle, blows my mind. But then again, I'm a product of the Empire (British) not a North-American.

But while the idea of using a stove top kettle (have done so in the past) is fine, the thought of using a microwave to heat up a cup of water for tea seems abhorent. (although it's really not)

I guess it came about because 110V not being as efficient? Or more American's are coffee drinkers?


intern suggested years ago and now electric kettle pretty much first thing buy anytime stay somewhere longer than a couple of weeks if doesn’t already have


https://www.reddit.com/r/MapPorn/comments/odqjef/this_is_a_m...

I don't know about you, but I'm skeptical.


That largely just seems like a pop density map of those people who are likely on the English internet. Or in other words: the shows the base rate of UFO sightings is relatively location independent


Much more people on the English internet, including a huge number of Indians. But the map does seem to correlate well with the population density of Anglo-Americans in particular. Which is telling me that this is not a map of "all UFO sightings" at all and is massively biased towards sightings by Western English-speaking people.


This is wildly off. Russia alone should be as bright as the US.


And limited run it. So it there are XX orders already, then the youtube video is delisted, so only exists in paper form.


And worse (sometimes) consumed by email scanners. There's all sorts of hassles with them. Email deliverability often an issue too.


I learned I can't play Doom if I can't strafe. I'm a bot!


Not quite the same, but if you've a leaf blower, then making a hovercraft with a couple of pool noodles and a circular piece of plywood is pretty cool (and a lot of fun).


Hiroshi Sakurazaka wrote 'All you need is kill', which became Edge of Tomorrow film.

And, while not SciFi, I think Haruki Murakami's books are worth a read and might scratch and itch you didn't realise you had. Start with Norwegian Wood if you want a light intro, but then Windup Bird Chronicle next. Possibly 1Q84 after that?


Hard Boiled Wonderland and the End of The World is a pretty underrated Murakami novel. It gets talked about much less than his other works- undeservedly so.


I think Murakami’s books are a great suggestion. Magical realism, nowhere near sci-fi, but very easy to slip into. However, 1Q84 feels a bit like a heavy recommendation even if you’re a Murakami fan. It’s a bit more of a commitment and I think it helps if you’re familiar with his other stories before diving into it. I’d say try Hardboiled Wonderland first - I thought it stepped away from some of his recurring themes but still a good example of his style. Also a quicker read. He has a few anthologies might be good intros as well - I read two, Dance, Dance, Dance and The Elephant Also Vanishes, but I think he’s got some others.

Along the lines of magical realism, Kurt Vonnegut seems like a great recommendation too. His books incorporate a bit more sci-fi - Galapagos, Cat’s Cradle, Sirens of Titan, slaughterhouse five, …


It should be noted that Edge of Tomorrow is reported to be very different from the novel, particularly the conclusion. I've read only the novel and it's a decent read in its own right.


Quick bug.

As an unauthed user, add a habit. Then log in. Habit has disappeared. (but can create habits, which then sync just fine to other devices)

I guess I was expecting my unauthed user habit to persist after logging in.


I did it before your comment. My habit persists. Firefox on Android if that matters.


original creator: https://twitter.com/watawatabou

Was always free... now people have gone to town with the source code.


Now they just need to organise effectively.

But how do you organise a disparate group whose only common characteristic is that they don't believe in imaginary deities?


No, they don’t. They aren’t a group. They’re not anti-religion, they just aren’t yes. Just because you’re not for something doesn’t mean you’re against it for others.


Anecdotally, most people interested in The Network State [0] are nones. Perhaps that could be a "place" to aggregate them (us)?

[0]: https://thenetworkstate.com/


According to the article, a small majority of "nones" believe in God or gods.


You misread the article. They believe in God, they just are not interested in grouping.

So basically exactly the opposite of what you said: They specifically do not want to organize.


Start a subreddit.

I don’t think I’m actually joking.


If the defining principal is you don't trust organization/s/, that might not help:)


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: