Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more computer's commentslogin

I have some questions about the legality: Since the miners mine this contract (or include it in the blockchain, or whatever it is for Ether), does that make them violate the UIGEA [1] or other gambling laws? And since the OP lives in NY, does creating & posting this violate, for example, "promotion of gambling"-laws? [2]

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unlawful_Internet_Gambling_Enf...

[2] http://ypdcrime.com/penal.law/article225.htm


I think this would be illegal. Could this be considered a raffle?


You speak about "Europe" like it's a country with a single set of regulations. It's not-- it's a continent. Even for the European Union, the rules are actually extremely varied:

http://www.worker-participation.eu/National-Industrial-Relat...

And even those countries with councils have (as the link also mentions) very varying rules on exactly what the councils do. Please don't say "Europe" when you mean "some European country".


so Germany has not taken over all of Europia? color me surprised.

oder aber du checker überlegst mal, für wen die simplifizierung 'Europa' gedacht war.


What's at stake is not just the debt of Greece, but also Italy, Spain, and possibly others. Forgiving Greece part of its debts sets a precedent for those countries, raising the stakes greatly.


Greece is unlikely to pay back more than a small percentage of its current debt (it will default eventually, no country can lose a quarter of its GDP and then suddenly have surplus budgets). The current scheme is about turning Greece into an example for Portugal, Spain and Italy (who are all playing around with austerity with varying degrees of success). What this all comes back to is that many of the loans should never have been made and banks made loans for stupid and unprofitable projects.

One of the core problems in all of this is that neoliberal political thought is forcing collective responsibility for what was poor commercial and economic management of a few companies, banks and governments on taxpayers in both creditor and debtor states. Responsibility is being enforced through tax dollars going into both debt forgiveness and service cuts. Poor due diligence and risk management on the part of creditors and reckless borrowing is burdening the populations of both "Germany" and "Greece" (where Germany and Greece are the creditor and debtor nations) with the costs.


It is a hard problem. Forgiving the debt once is likely the right thing to do, but if you keep doing it, what is to prevent countries from just never paying at all?

The sorts of restructuring plans that are put into place are designed to solve this problem, but I think whoever designed them is a sadist.

It is said you cannot spend your way out of a recession (and I'd agree that one off projects that don't kick start a continued source of income don't work), but you also cannot make so many budget cuts that no one in the country has a job, or a house, or a support network of any kind. Zero tax revenue does not make for a stable government.

(It does make for a really corrupt one though, and a much worse type of corruption than what Greece had before)


If debt is forgiven or defaulted upon, then it becomes harder to borrow in the future (i.e. they must do so at higher interest rates to account for the risk). If countries never paid their debt then no one would loan to them or would loan only at astronomical interest rates.


Debt are forgiven all the time. Germany had some of its war debt forgiven, by countries such as Greece.


So Greece will be forced to accept conditions that prevent her ever paying her debt and why? So that other countries will be too terrified to follow in her footsteps?

Is this brutal and bleak blunt instrument really the most sophisticated strategy that we can muster in the 21st century? Can we really do no better?


Well, what is the alternative? Germany admits they've juiced their export driven economy via an artificially depressed currency, then either (1) leaves the euro themselves, or (2) agrees to permanent support to the less-productive peripheral countries inside the currency union?

You may find this interesting: http://blog.mpettis.com/2015/02/when-do-we-decide-that-europ...


> Germany admits they've juiced their export driven economy via an artificially depressed currency, then either (1) leaves the euro themselves, or (2) agrees to permanent support to the less-productive peripheral countries inside the currency union?

Yes. Shouldn't the German national ego be counted less important than making everyone's accounting add up?


preaching to the choir

now what's your strategy on bringing germany around to that pov? Because their politicians are poisoning the environment so that you can't even start that discussion.


Regarding that GDP: it's important to note that borrowing money (and spending it) pretty much directly increases GDP. So saying that austerity is causing a decline in GDP is only half the story: Greece borrowing too much money was one reason it was high in the first place.


Or it would signal that ending austerity is actually impossible for Greek politicians. If several parties in a row had promised to double the number of moons, they would also have had to renege on that promise.

The main difference is, of course, that it wasn't clear that it would be impossible to end austerity, with some thinking that the Troika would give in. But that doesn't mean the end of democracy.


>Or it would signal that ending austerity is actually impossible

It basically signaled that the Troika will cajole, threaten, blackmail and generally do everything in their power to keep the austerity train going.

Ultimately, though, that's the way to destroy the currency union. An economic policy based upon wage suppression and privatization of monopoly industries is nice for some people, but it isn't sustainable.


No. They actually share >95% of the desktop code-base: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HROqnw-nf4


Of all the comments so far on this, this is maybe the coolest. You can really see how Office on OSX has shaped up (if you follow the beta; identical Windows and OSX support on launch day instead of OSX getting it 2 years later like it's been for the past decade), but I'm surprised Android also shares a significant amount of the code base.

It cuts down on bugs, and also makes sure the bugs that are on the desktop are also the same ones on my phone (principal of least surprise at work).


I'm not sure which is better


That's a good point. If I do a follow-up, it will possibly be on my personal website.

For what it's worth, I'm responding to inquiries with my identity and more details. So far, I've received several really interesting projects.


Thank you!

On a general note: my apologies for not including my identity and portfolio; I didn't want this experiment to be the first hit when you google me.


Why not?


In a lot of professional services fields, the reputation of working for free or cheap tends to bring in really bad customers that tend to be more trouble than they are worth.


Hmm, now I am confused. I thought you were giving your identity, that's why I liked it


I am not the OP.


It doesn't need to be on all the time. It can just take however long it wants to start up, connect, and transmit the order.


i think many people are missing this key point. this isn't a "i need this right this very millisecond" its more of a "i need this later today if its early enough or tomorrow would be fine" button. which a single press of a button would wake up the device, connect to what ever configured network connection it is assigned to, send some data to an API end point, go back to sleep. that could make the button last many years.


Looks like a weekly magazine, so this edition would cover April 1st.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: