Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | biesnecker's commentslogin

$10k is such an insanely small amount of money (compared to SWE salaries) for someone at a big tech company to risk their job for.


This was the first example that popped to mind: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/aug/22/google-cs...

Not having Google accounts isn't the end of the world, but given the amount that many (most?) of us rely on their services (I think of all the accounts I have tied to my @gmail email and cringe, but still I'm there), this is fairly disasterous.


This. People tend not to realize how sprawling enterprise software stacks tend to be, how many implicit dependencies have to be untangled, etc. Even simple things can take years and complicated things often just don’t get done at all.


Yes, dealing with the mess that is your software stack, the mess that is your corporate structure, and the mess that is your change management process means that things a couple dudes in your startup could accomplish in a week would take a year at a crusty enterprise.


All my feedback has been covered by others, so just +1 on “this is awesome, he (and you) should be proud!” Looking forward to seeing his internship projects in a decade or so.


I don’t click on HN articles expecting to cry, but here we are.


Pretty soon the apes in charge are going to be using this study to demand that the chimps return to the office 5 days per week.


There are 330 million of us, too. The vast majority can be reasonable people and that still leaves millions of batshit crazy Americans out there to write about.

Edit: typo


If people could understand this and have a better sense about the scale of millions and billions, a lot of social problems plaguing humanity would be gone.


Which social problems? I think many people do understand this and problems directly resulting from a lack of this understanding aren't actually that present in the real world, but by the same reasoning, people think others don't because that's the poison you see on the Internet.

In day to day life, it's fairly acceptable to just acknowledge that some contingent of whichever population is made up of lunatics and move on with your life. It's only other lunatics, typically also only on social media, that can't do that, but normal people just don't bother paying attention to them. and hope they burn out.


I'm American and I grew up with many perfectly nice people (including family) that have held morally repugnant beliefs. Same for people in many other countries. Only exception are cab drivers - they get talkative quickly with no filter. I think the US is veering in the direction. People are complex. It's only when you get to know them beyond superficial conversations / introductions that this becomes apparent.


I don't know, I've seen Americans stereotype people up and down, but the moment you mention an American stereotype, it's always "this is a big country, there are lots of people here". Just notice how "Chinese people" and "IP theft" go hand in hand here.


Pascal was the language that AP Computer Science was taught in in the mid-90s when I took it. We used Turbo Pascal 6.0 for DOS, and I have fond memories. I think I'd still prefer C, but I appreciate the nostalgia.


Chinese grammar only really seems like English in the beginning. It diverges fairly aggressively from intermediate onwards.


Does your employer pay you for hours or output? I'm a salaried employee, I get paid for output, not the time it takes to produce.

I think if anything you're stealing from yourself, robbing yourself of the opportunity to take on more responsibility, grow faster, etc.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: