Caddy supports it, and has quite a bit written about it: https://caddyserver.com/docs/automatic-https#encrypted-clien...

What about this? https://f-droid.org/packages/co.adityarajput.notifilter

The website this post is on is a wiki that explains how to solve a lot of different puzzles like the rubix cube.

I’m having a really hard time to understand even the “beginner’s method” on that wiki.

For example, it entirely glosses over how to solve the „first two layers“ (F2L) on the left and back faces. It only ever explains F2L for the front and right faces. However, I can’t possibly achieve a „yellow cross“ that way. I wonder why I can’t seem to find any source that actually explains it.

I generally prefer written tutorials over video tutorials, but cubing related stuff is an exception. Videos are easier to digest.

Here's a good beginner tutorial:

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLBHocHmPzgIjnAbNLHDyc...

Thank you!

Thanks. Looks promising!

Watched it with some friends on shrooms for the first time. Incredible. All the movies we watched after it that night felt bland and uninteresting.

Why wouldn't we want jobs to be automated exactly?

Because if a job is automted, it means that the person whose job is automated now is unemployed. Even if we have UBI, it means that the person DOING the automating will get a disproportionate share of the resources compared with the pittance given to the person who was automated.

Personally, I don't want my job to be automated. I write for a living and if AI takes my job, I won't get paid. I prefer to create value in the world that other people appreciate. I don't WANT to sit in a concrete cage (an apartment) and consume media, with no real purpose in society.

Believe it or not, the majority of people in the world need to feel like they are working for something. Yes, some people will be able to find other causes (mine will be the opposition of AI), but others won't. Of course, that will mean the necessity of drugging people with media (and physical substances...why do you think marijuana is becoming legal in more places?).

The end result is a mode of pure consumption for almost all except the elite who control all the production, and they will decide what happens with the world. Personally, I don't want that: I want land and autonomy to use it to grow food and preserve ecosystems. I want the world to be sustainable, and not just set up for the purpose of furthering technology.

You speak of societal changes on a year-scale. I'm talking about decades and the long-term. This level of automation is bad, and won't do any favours for humanity except the ultra-rich, who will eventually perish like everyone else.

I'm always dumbfounded by the luddites on hackernews, it blows my mind.

Don't worry, I am equally dumbfounded by blind faith in technology.

Is your position that the scenario outlined above is irrational?

Yes, it is; it's as irrational as seamstresses complaining about looms.

...unless we change our socio-political systems. A complex endeavour but worth remembering.

Change, or revolt against them...

Because every job that gets automated creates massive unemployment for those who were skilled in it

what do you think will happen to us devs if AI gets good enough to do our jobs? Do you think our companies will keep us around because we're just so darn smart?

What do you think is _already happening_ to in-house artists, content/technical writers, marketing analysts, and other jobs that are directly impacted by LLMs in their current form?

I'm not a selfish asshole, just a normal asshole. Yeah, I'm going to be affected by my job also being automated, everyone will. It's not a field specific problem. It's a societal paradigm change.

This doesn't bother you? If not, how come?

Well at this point in time we live in a capitalist world and people need money to survive?

I assume you like being paid, buying things, food, etc.

Would it be great if we lived in a utopian society that money no longer mattered. Sure! Even with AI I see basically zero chance of that happening in any reasonable amount of time before AI destroys our society.

I think the point is that amino is just one public ipfs dht, so they renamed it, so that other public ipfs dhts can exist without confusion.

How can Linux be a niche use case for git if git was made as a version control system for Linux?

Niche use cases are a great reason to make a bespoke tool! But that doesn’t make it not a niche use case. And it doesn’t mean that tool is optimal for the common use case.

The thread continues and he actually got through all of them.

I found this a few weeks ago: https://github.com/mlvzk/manix

Isn't P always the same? Or is it shared before the exchange?

Edit: just looked it up and the base point for curve25519 is x=9 so no point in recovering it.

In modern curves P is set in stone head of time.

In the early days of EC you were able to pick a custom base point, and then it was found that this could leak information in various ways. It’s not allowed in modern curves or implementations.

Sorry, I wrote that comment too quickly. It is close to impossible to recover ka, kb and ka.kb.P, even given A=ka.P, B=kb.P and P.