100%
It's worse than the old days of only having cable and having to pay a small fortune. I'm not going to pay the same (or more) and then have to jump around between 12 different apps.
We literally went back to cable because other than the ideology, it wasn't beneficial. For the streaming services I do want, I can actually order then through Xfinity and keep things simple.
I recently stayed somewhere with cable and relatives were watching content for the holidays. I was reminded of just how obnoxious having 30+ minutes of ads for 1.5 hours of content is. I’d rather just not have any content.
Yeah I can't watch anything with unskipable ads anymore. It's just not worth it. The one exception is live sports, but that's not soo bad because there are timeouts anyway. I just hit mute when the ads are running.
I watch NFL RedZone, which jumps game to game to follow the action, with no commercials. Obviously that only works when you have that many games going at once. (Also ironically one of the reasons why I switched back to cable, as it really wasn't on the streaming packages that made sense for us)
I agree it's not perfect. I was just tired of having to train an ML model and spin up a 24-node Kubernetes cluster just to figure out what services I needed to watch the particular combination of shows my wife and I like.
Exactly! 75k is peanuts today, especially if you're single. Most people from my generation aren't even making that...what hope is there for them, let alone for Z.
The only hope is political organization. You can say it's peanuts, but it's also above the median household income. Sit back and think about that: what you consider peanuts (and you may well not be wrong) is more than the median household income in this country. If you are not outraged by this, then sure, there's no hope :)
I do think corps are part of the problem, but not necessarily due to control. Cities are self-reinforcing growth due to the inherent chicken-and-egg problem regarding jobs and companies. Companies don't want to move to the boonies, not enough workers. Workers don't want to move to the boonies, not enough jobs. And everyone wants to be close to universities, because networks, while universities aren't willing to spend resources to move. This was already the case before telecommunication became as advanced as it did in the recent 15 years.
WFH might help break the cycle to some degree, but the majority people will still be in cities (by virtue of, well, being a city), which creates incentives for younger generations to go there (dating + outgoing life), even for those who would rather settle outside the city once they find a partner.
Baked into this theory is the belief that people only live in cities for job prospects, and not because they want to for every other part of their life. The belief is untrue at least for me and everyone I know.
Observer's bias? Of course you observe people in that situation, because of where you are.
I agree though, that folks also live in cities by inertia. They've always lived there, and don't know any better. Even though they've got problems getting employment and housing, they can't see any solution. That's a demographic too.
Oh it’s very clearly observer’s bias, I don’t mean to suggest otherwise. That’s exactly my point. I just wanted to push back on the idea that there are two kinds of people - those who don’t live in cities, and those who live in cities reluctantly.
Working from home seems to have a similar narrative on hacker news I’ve found, probably for similar reasons - either you work from home happily or you reluctantly go into the office.
that's not the point - they were saying that retroactively going back and viewing old content on 4k, you can easily spot the CG/issues etc.
ex: Farscape - all the CG was rendered in low res, so even when you view a 1080p copy it looks silly. Imagine all the content that would have to be re-done and upscaled to make it watchable in 4k.
Computers do some pretty "dumb shit" when they're flooded with data and running bad algorithms. I mean 737MAX didn't need a pilot error in order to do something critically bad.
