Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | awkwabear's commentslogin

This is what I always try to emphasize to the junior guys I've worked with. I read the book Flowers for Algernon when I was younger and it was the thing that stood out to me the most.

It does not matter how right you are if no one likes or will listen to you. Unfortunately, being likeable is inifinitely more important than being right. Your job is to strike a balance between both otherwise stupid likeable people will be dictating the direction.


Being right about most things more often than everyone else is an inherently likeable quality.

It's not really about being "likeable", but being persuasive. Don't put the cart before the horse.

You're correct that being right isn't enough, but if you make being likeable a direct goal you will come off as insincere and fail.


Damn wow I really need to make up a reason to use this.


This seems like a really bad take.

I do PhD research for superconducting materials and right I've been adapting and scaling an existing segmentation model from a research paper for image processing to run multithreaded and took the training runtime per image from 55min to 2min. Yeah it was low hanging fruit but honestly its the type of thing that is just tedious and easy to make mistakes and spend forever debugging.

Like sure I could have done it myself but it would have taken me days to figure out and I would have had to test and read a ton of docs. Claude got it working in like half an hour and generated every data plot I could need. If I wanted to test out different strategies and optimizations, I could iterate through various strategies rapidly.

I don't really like to rely on AI a bunch but it indisputably is incredibly good at certain things. If I am just trying to get something done and don't need to worry about vulnerabilities as it is just data collection code that runs once, it saves a tremendous amount of time. I don't think it will outright replace developers but there is some room for it to expand the effectiveness of individual devs so long as they are actually providing oversight and not just letting it do stuff unchecked.

I think the larger issue is more how economically viable it is for businesses to spend a ton on electricity and compute for me to be able to use it like this for 20 bucks a month. There will be an inevitable enshittification of services once a lot of the spaces investors are dumping money are figured out to be dead ends and people start calling for returns on their investment.

Right now the cash is flowing cause business people don't fully understand what its good at or not but that's not gonna last forever.


I don't think you got the author's point.

They didn't say "AI is bad". Take another look.


Ah I'm sorry you're totally right, I was irresponsible and just skimmed the article last time.

I retract my last statement about it being a bad take


It's fine. I'm as guilty of skimming articles and bad takes as well :)


This definitely happens on other platforms as well but there is a key difference in noting that twitter is now privately owned by a single person who has shown themself to be insecure and prone to lashing publicly at critics.

I think twitter is uniquely concentrated in its influence by its owner and willingness to do things so blatantly, other platforms need to at least pretend to not steer things so directly as not to upset shareholders.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: