It reminded me of those Asimov worlds where everything moves by machine and nobody really walks anymore. It sounds futuristic, but also a bit depressing. Sure, it’s more efficient but life feels flatter somehow.
My family used to host yearly neighborhood dinners people brought food, sang, danced. Those things faded over time, but reading this made me realize: that was the heartbeat of a community. Without those rituals, we quietly turn into islands.
I’m really curious if every patient started using Claude or GPT to negotiate with hospitals, how would the system respond? Maybe hospitals and insurers would start using AI too to fight back?
Every time they bring up AGI, it feels more like a business strategy to me.
It helps them attract investors and dominate the public narrative.
For OpenAI, AGI is both a vision and a moat.
The Turing test is long outdated. Modern models can fool humans, but fooling isn’t understanding. Maybe we should flip the perspective AGI isn’t about imitation, it’s about discovering patterns autonomously in open environments.
The era of the AI bubble economy has arrived, and now almost everyone is interacting with and using AI. Just like your feeling, this is an article organized with GPT. Perhaps the story really happened.
Every time I see a data breach caused by a third party vendor, I can't help but wonder why are these big companies so deeply reliant on outsourcing, yet so lax when it comes to controlling security?
Usually some regulation change that the company is not aware off, they have to run to find a fix as soon as possible, some business guy who don't know anything about tech find a vendor who are ready to sell a solution (they probably created their whole business last month on a gamble that the new regulation would be passed and that businesses would be rushing for a solution). Then they simply buy that solution "for compliance" as a top down decision, even when internal employees ring the warning bell.
I don't think incidents like this are minor. I believe personal information security is very important. Maybe they see the consequences as small, but I don't.
I don't meant the consequences to the people who had the data leaked. I mean the consequences to the companies that didn't take security seriously and leaked the data.
This kind of laptop bag is understated and practical, and it's fine if you're only carrying a laptop. But once you add things like a charger, cables, or a mouse, the lack of compartments becomes a real issue. Everything gets jumbled together, which not only makes it messy but also risks scratching your laptop. The practicality takes a hit.
OP uses a laptop sleeve[0] so scratching isn't a worry.
Some people are "pocket for everything" organizers and some just aren't. I throw it all together anyway, and at least this has a modicum of stealth and misdirection. Nice to have extra space to chuck in a few things, too.
For a hacker community (original definition) many seem to dislike actual hacks...
