You don’t think her ego got in the way?

I think she had a principled perspective not to politicize her role as a Supreme Court Justice. Maybe her ideology was wrong.

> I think she had a principled perspective not to politicize her role as a Supreme Court Justice.

I can buy that.

> isn't it still quite wrong that one minister can financially bet against the administration?

Why?

Because it encourages him to work against the administration.

isn't this violating copyright?

The mods do not seem to care about pirated software (or links to tons of it) being posted here, I have seen people doing it for years now.

Dunno but the repo is 4+ years old.

ugh. nothing prevents you from writing "software the old way"

you have agency.

you're right, nothing stops me. i still can. but that's not really the point.

when everyone around you is shipping in hours what used to take weeks, the pressure to keep up changes how you approach things. you know the answer is one prompt away. that changes your brain. it's like saying you can still use a paper map when GPS exists, technically true, but you won't, and you know it.

the post isn't about going back. it's about acknowledging that something shifted in how we learn by building.

You could look for a position in a company where genAI use is not so prevalent. They're still very common and do very interesting work.

Yeah that's fair, those teams probably produce better engineers in the long run too.

I mean... this is superficial, not insightful or illuminating. No aha moment here.

> Neither Apple nor Xerox "invented" overlapping windows.

Apple Lisa and Macintosh are widely credited with the first practical, commercial implementation of overlapping windows in a Graphical User Interface.

Although Xerox PARC developed early prototypes, Apple engineer Bill Atkinson is credited with creating the code that made functional, rapid-rendering overlapping windows possible.

For agentic coding, which do you prefer:

a) qwen3-coder

b) qwen3.5 (general)

Unlike social networks or auction platforms, the mass departure of users (this isn’t that), would not affect the quality of experience of those remaining. There’s not the same network effects.

So the investors would pound the same amount of money, into a platform with dwelling number of users?

Unfortunately the US military has very deep pockets.

The New American Dream: Start as a non-profit dedicated to humanity, pivot to a for-profit to scale and eventually find your final form as a subsidiary of the military industrial complex.

Where every employee can watch the news to see how many people their efforts are killing.

Apparently 27% of the population of the USA wouldn't have a problem doing exactly that.

In other words, US tax payers are already paying customers of OpenAI, a few simply won’t be a “double” customer. This isn’t “exactly” fascism, no. It’s something though.

No where near as deep as the broader economy. It is likely more profitable to pass on the govt contracts for the foreseeable future

Dwindling, and probably, yes. For a while, anyway.

Dwindling number. But maybe? I mean, they're already investing at a level that's completely disconnected from actual results, based on magical thinking and hopium. Just take another hit.

Why would I use this instead of Alire?

https://alire.ada.dev/

> Experts will naturally use these systems more productively, because they know how to coerce models into the correct conditional distributions which light up the right techniques.

Part of it comes down to “knowing” what questions to ask.

I see it like the relationship between a student and research advisor. The advisor will ideally know the terrain and suggest a fruitful line of attack (what to ask), and the student will follow through, learning along the way.