It seems like the average consumer of diet sweeteners is already likely to be overweight, diabetic, or have other ailments. This article seems highly sensationalized. For the average person, the risk of sugar impacting blood glucose levels seems far riskier than any side effect of a NSS
As a former twitter entertainer once said, "I have never seen a thin person drinking Diet Coke."
I suppose we could do a nation-wide experiment by insisting that the sugar water vendors use only NSS for a year; but that would probably result in the overthrow of the government.
The fattest person I ever worked with used to drink 4-8 litres of diet coke a day. When I met him again two years later, his weight was normal. Asked how he did it, he just stopped drinking the diet coke.
NNSs trigger the same insulin/fat storage mechanism as sugar, but they arent absorbed, and stay on the blood longer, leading to insulin resistance.
Also interested to see if there's any proof of this. I know, anecdotally as an obese man, that whether I cut out diet soda or not doesn't seem to make a difference. Maybe I'm not doing it for long enough?
There's lots.
Here's one that tested sugar+sweetener, note the decrease in insulin clearance when sweeteners are consumed, vs just sugar:
sucralose ingestion caused 1) a greater incremental increase in peak plasma glucose concentrations (4.2 ± 0.2 vs. 4.8 ± 0.3 mmol/L; P = 0.03), 2) a 20 ± 8% greater incremental increase in insulin area under the curve (AUC) (P < 0.03), 3) a 22 ± 7% greater peak insulin secretion rate (P < 0.02), 4) a 7 ± 4% decrease in insulin clearance (P = 0.04), and 5) a 23 ± 20% decrease in SI (P = 0.01).
It's anecdata but I've seen similar - however, it could also be explained by "not taking weight loss seriously if all you do is switch to gallons of diet drink".
And for lots of sodas, caffeine plays, too. It's hard to factor out the various issues that could also be present.
That tweet doesn't reflect my experience at all actually, in Europe at least. I know it's an anecdote but I know many fit people that drink frequently Diet Coke or Coke Zero. Is this a US thing?
Yeah, and also not even an insightful joke. I mean, isn't Taylor Swift, notable thin pretty human, a famous Diet Coke fan? That's just the first person who comes to mind. Also half the people I know, as well.
From my understanding the evidence of gut biome modification is weak, and would require a large volume consumption.
Some NSS will cause temporary stomach upset if it’s your first few times consuming them. But I don’t think this has any long term impacts on gut health.
Some NSS are healthy for your oral micro biome (erythritol for sure).
Well, .dev domain has HSTS enabled to all subdomains. And there won't be even a hit to port 80 - it goes straight HTTPS by browser because of preload list. So you can't have non-HTTPS site on .dev domain visited by a browser. Thats some value.
Suggesting long term SERM use in replacement of a bio identical testosterone does not seem like the brightest idea. There have been reports of blurred vision, floaters in the eyes, and more (look on pubmed under just about any SERM, but specifically clomid).
In my opinion it would be much safer to suggest recombinant FSH and LH. The brain testes axis seems to have the least amount of atrophy over time from anecdotal experiences of those online and in a few case reports. I do not think HCG should be used long term due to the non-bio identical nature, but it is a good short term LH mimic if my memory serves me correctly. Would be a great addition to a TRT protocol.
Research indicates blurred vision happens but is rare.
I thought LH/FSH is usually increased using HCG injections? Is there an oral route for LH//FSH? One of the benefits of clomiphene is it’s orally administered so no complex refrigeration / injectable requirements.
Genuine question, how is a browser tab different than thunderbird? Besides storing a local copy of mail (which is obviously a huge win), I don't see a big difference. If anything I like the web UI better.
However, for my uses I simply installed proton bridge + apple mail. It just works with all email services I use.
> Genuine question, how is a browser tab different than thunderbird?
Different protocols for one thing - HTTP vs IMAP and/or POP/SMTP.
Each webmail app does things it’s own way. Webmail conflates the app and the protocol and the provider. Some people prefer to have mail from different providers in a unified app.