Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | TimGremalm's commentslogin

"When an unregistered user edits Wikipedia, he or she is identified by his or her IP address. These IP addresses are translated to users' approximate geographic location. Unregistered users only make a fraction of total edits -- only 15% of the contributions to English Wikipedia are from unregistered users. Edits by registered users do not have associated IP information, so the map actually represents only a small portion of the total edit activity on Wikipedia."


    s/unregistered/not logged in/
Registered users often don't bother with logging in.


I log in, mostly so my IP doesn't get put on blast in the log.


I log in. Mostly for nostalgia, (I started the resilience wikipedia page and still regret doing it without an account!) but also for skipping the annoying pledge banners.


I'm not sure thats true since it's a policy violation (without proper disclosure) that is fairly regularly enforced when found


not really. logging out to do certain things is a violation, but simply editing logged out by itself is not a violation. see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Legitim...


My mistake, though as i understand its still frowned upon, further down WP:LOGOUT says a little why


I wouldn't say that's a common practice.


I always log in to edit, then log out.


I log in mostly for the custom CSS.


Spacedashboard have a nice summary of the streams and the position over earth. https://spacedashboard.com/


The article on Virtual Boy was super interesting!


It's more like a roast by a comedian. Bryan Lunduke have made this talk many times before at Linux conferences.


I've read about this neat process for extracting CO2 from the atmosphere. You place a ultra compact box in the ground containing it's own building instructions and tooling for separating CO2 in to oxygen and building giant structures of the carbon. It's apparently called photosynthesis.


You're joking, but producing biochar is actually a decent way of doing carbon capture that doesn't require any fancy technology. You even get some energy out of it. Unfortunately you'd need to plant absolutely massive amounts of trees to put a dent into the trillion tonnes of CO2 we've released in the last 150 years.


Also algae could be neat allies. But there we are playing with fire, maybe GMO algae can be engineered to be supper efficient, but at the risk of compromising marine ecosystems.


The fern Azolla already did this once! linky --> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azolla_event


There's a lower-tech way to get algae on board - feed them the micronutrients they're limited by in the ocean, which is mostly iron:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocean_fertilization

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_fertilization



Noclip did an interesting documentary about GOG. "GOG: Preserving Gaming's Past & Future" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffngZOB1U2A


I like this narrated version https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MticYPfFRp8


"two principles in mind when building my own systems.

Rule #1: No external dependencies.

Rule #2: Mechanical overrides."


Rick & Morty: real fake doors https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxbsV8QWGic


Eheh, thanks.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: