It is a well-known fact that the moment YouTube goes down, the collective productivity of Earth increases by approximately 4,000%, which is immediately squandered by everyone going to Hacker News to read comments about YouTube being down. I myself have taken to podcasts… an ancient medium in which people simply talk at you for ninety minutes without a single sponsorship for a mobile game, and this is considered a failure
Well one must also argue the opposite. I myself have gained immense knowledge from YouTube. I have learned things like phone screen replacements or phone battery replacements. I call myself a mechanic from the school of YouTube and have saved myself at minimum $10k in repairs doing the work myself. I have learned to make endless food recipes or create things like giant bubbles or slime for my kids. My point is that I bet sure for some YouTube is a massive time sink waste of time. But I also wonder how much it has improved the knowledge, skills and ability of others.
My dad often mentions how had he had YouTube when he was younger how much it would have done for him. He talks about having to go to the library and if lucky there was a book that could show you the knowledge you were looking for. He says but now you can find not just the knowledge but for example specific knowledge like car make model and year and how exactly to do job xyz.
Ultimately I just can not imagine life without the wealth of knowledge YouTube has given me.
Lol I laughed out loud reading this comment. When shorts first came out they annoyed me to no end. I searched for how to block them through settings or other ways to just make them go away.
But now days I can admit there are a few, very few, content creators who create shorts that are very informative and straight to the point that can cover a topic and give you many facts and let you decide if you want to seek more. Sometimes it is nice to have the 30 seconds Coles notes verses a video stretched out to 10 minutes to be eligible for monetization.
BUT, and this is a big but, the shorts and similar video platform trends scare me as a parent. I can see how my kids find a 1.5 hour movie boring but can scroll endlessly through shorts. It might seem harmless letting your kid just scroll on YouTube from my perspective is like an addiction and kids are getting that dopamine hit watching a clip and seconds later watching something else. I've learned that it is very important to be aware of what your kids are being accustomed to and push them in the right direction.
Personally, I just scroll through them. They break the feed into well defined "chapters" at the end of what I can decide to look into the next one or go somewhere else because there's nothing good there today.
Also there's this woman that makes very funny shorts about software development and good long videos that aren't as good. I look for her shorts too.
VPN to Sweden to get the IP geolocated ads to retarget. The ads still exist but they're less obnoxious, and they're often in Swedish so you don't have to know what they're on about anyway.
Careful, I enjoyed this bonus (being in Japan and not being able to keep up with the ads)... so much so, that I started ignoring the Japanese. Including my wife. You can imagine how well that went.
Give it another 10-20 years and your 2 hour podcasts will be 30 minutes of morning zoo DJ banter, 10 minutes of guests, and 1.5 hours of ads.
We’ll have reached peak 90s all over again. With any luck we’ll avoid recreating the conditions for another Nickelback and can stay in the weird zone where Trip Hop and pop punk could chart at the same time.
The 00's podcasts I listened to were often in 2-3 hour episodes, rarely well scripted (or scripted at all?), but a lot of fun and very amateurish. I re-listened to several entire series recently and the episode lengths were the only thing I think was worse than in newer podcasts.
On the other hand, if ads etc gets too annoying, I already have run all my downloaded podcasts through whisper to get transcripts with timestamps. Running some LLM to find ranges to delete would probably be quite easy. As a bonus I would be happy to also cut out all the filler repetitions that seem popular these days ("yes, X, I absolutely agree, [repeats everything X just said]"). Could probably cut 1 hour episodes to 20 minutes without losing any content.
At least it is somewhat relevant. Hearing ads about Irish telecom operator ads at the other side of europe is pretty goofy. What's the actual point? Just worsening the podcast experience?
I watched a movie, same late night talk show host, something like "welcome night owls".
I "loved" the style but I haven't found any actual radio on the internet of that style or a podcast. Not sure about name of movie but I do remember it being in the last 10-15 years.
This is really lovely work! Simple to use, surprisingly solid, and just a pleasure to poke around with. The fact it runs in the browser is a bit of magic on its own.
One idea for later might be a few preset systems, such as Alpha Centauri or other known three-body systems. It would give people a quick way to drop into something real before they start making chaos of their own.
Thanks so much, really appreciate it! I’ve been focusing the presets on stable or interesting solutions that aren’t tied to real systems, but adding a few real examples like Alpha Centauri would fit in nicely. I’ll keep that on the list for future updates.
I recently got into the show "Silicon Valley" after never making it past season 1. Really loving it..... and thought this was the Pied Piper company too.
The detection of a potential giant planet in the habitable zone of Alpha Centauri A is compelling, not because we could live on the planet (likely a gas giant), but because it could host moons with the right conditions for life. If even one of those moons is Earth-sized and water-rich, it might be our nearest shot at finding another habitable world.
Still, getting there with something like David Kipping’s proposed TARS propulsion system (a solar-powered launcher that can fling tiny probes at ~40 km/s) we’d be looking at 30,000+ years to reach the star system. It’s a step forward, but for now, our best hope is to keep watching. Until someone develops fusion propulsion…
Note that the "Earth-sized" condition in there is doing some heavy lifting. Earth is a factor of 40x more massive than the largest moon in our solar system. A body needs to be fairly close to Earth's mass to have enough gravity to retain liquid water on its surface. Not that it couldn't happen, but we currently don't have any known precedent for a moon that large.
Sometime this week there was an article talking about using lasers to send 1cm probes at 0.25c to alpha centauri. Estimates are 30 years for arrival of a swarm of these.
We would need to master gravity as a manipulating force instead of a constant. There’s faster methods of traveling long distances than just pointing your nose at it.
What you’re describing is Bayesian inference in action. Given how rare big interstellar comets should be, and how common small ones should be, the lack of detections makes the big-comet hypothesis incredibly unlikely. So we update our beliefs: it’s probably small. Space statistics at work
Cutting 20% from NASA isn’t just a loss of jobs, it’s a loss of momentum, morale, and institutional knowledge built over decades. We need more long-term vision, not less. NASA’s not just about space, it’s about pushing boundaries, educating future generations, and reminding us what’s possible when we aim higher together.
The ISS is set to be decommissioned in 2030 with a controlled descent into the Pacific Ocean. But with NASA’s recent budget cuts slashing science funding and crew size, the transition plan feels more like wishful thinking than a roadmap. Without proper support, America risks losing the foothold in low Earth orbit.
Summary: NASA’s Hubble and Chandra telescopes have identified a rare intermediate-mass black hole in galaxy NGC 6099, bridging the gap between stellar and supermassive black holes. These elusive objects are a missing link in our understanding of how black holes grow and evolve. By combining X-ray and optical data, astronomers found evidence of a dense star cluster and high-energy emissions, pointing to a black hole that helps complete the black hole family tree.
I’m a space enthusiast, and from what I’ve learned here’s the breakdown: solar systems take millions of years to form. It all starts in a nebula where gas collapses and coalesces into a star and surrounding material. The process is long and complex (and not fully understood), but we know it eventually produces rocky planets, gas giants, and smaller debris.
This new paper reports something exciting, they’ve spotted a moment that signals the beginning of rocky planet formation. In the system HOPS-315, gas has cooled enough for solids to condense, which is when planet formation kicks off. This happens about twice as far from its baby star as Earth is from the Sun.
And of course, ALMA, the telescope that made the discovery, is fantastic at catching solar systems in the act of forming. It was only a matter of time before this stage was observed.
reply