Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | KellyCriterion's commentslogin

Movie: Wall-E -> showing what you are saying :-D

Yeah the present has turned into a mashup of Wall-E, Idiocracy, Inifnite Jest, Back to the Future 2 with some ideas from Neal Stephenson borrowed by the tech bros who think they’re cultured.

Claude is "very good" in applying >var< continuously :-D

> and shared databases.

According to my understanding this is one of the reasons why microservices were invented, to prevent shared databases?


I had a C-level guy who installed on his fresh notebook a FireFox extension from the wrong domain, it contained mailware - he missed the official link in Google and clicked on whatever scammer site to download the extension :-X

720 kb SD or 1.44 MB DD ?

:-D


Sorry, nitpick: 720kB DD 1.44MB HD

It's funny that we've always called them "1.44 MB" disks when they actually hold 1440 KiB, which is 1.41 MiB or 1.47 MB.

"1.44" is a horrible mix of binary kilo and decimal mega which makes no sense.


With the GNU Units program, I have this defined in my ~/.units: "floppyMB 1000 KiB"

Is it useful? Perhaps not, but you can use it to translate "1.2 floppyMB", "1.44 floppyMB" into other units.


++1

:))


One could cheat and run a SuperDisk drive, with 120 MB! Though that's not in the spirit of the game.

but do you remember ZIP-drives? :-) (was that the name?)

Yes! Superfloppy!

Iomega's awesome Zip drive disk (100MB, 250MB, 750MB capacities) , I think I still have a 250MB zip drive somewhere in my home attic.

They required a dedicated zip drive (took up same sized slot/bay as a floppy disk drive), but (if I recall right) that drive was backward compatible standard 3&1⁄2-inch 1.44MB floppy disks.

Interestingly, these drive also came in variants to work with different types of interfaces: IDE, ATAPI, USB, SCSI, FireWire.

Zip drives filled the portable storage niche, until CDs and DVDs replaced their need.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zip_drive

I found it cool that floppies and superfloppies had label stickers on which we can write (with a sketch pen) to remind the user of what content the disk is intended for.

There were some nice cameras that used Zip disks for storage! Very convenient for photographers working on multiple projects or sessions.

https://www.digitalkameramuseum.de/en/prototypes-rarities/it...


> They required a dedicated zip drive (took up same sized slot/bay as a floppy disk drive), but (if I recall right) that drive was backward compatible standard 3&1⁄2-inch 1.44MB floppy disks.

Zip was a completely unique physical format, and had no backwards compatibility with standard 3½" disks.

SuperDisk, on the other hand (in both the LS-120 and LS-240 variants) was backwards compatible with standard floppy disks in the same drive.


ZIP Drives died as Minidisc died: MD was a very proper medium, but the inventors made some wrong decissions

Yes. Along with the feared click of death.

I have a bunch of them, some SCSI ones in old samplers.

Hey, my oscilloscope has one of those!

720k? In my day floppy disks had 96K and we liked it!

I liked when floppy disks were actually floppy.

3.5" floppies are still floppy. The case may be hard, but the floppy flops.

this was 8.25" back then?

RX-01 DEC / IBM 3740 compatible was 77 tracks, single-sided, 128 bytes per sector and 26 sectors per track. Total 256,256 bytes. FM Modulation. 360 RPM. Disk to drive buffer: 4 µsec per data bit. Track-to-Track Seek: 6 ms. Head Settle Time: 25 ms. Average Access: Approximately 262 ms. 8" diameter diskette

One of these was used to load the microcode into the VAX-11/780 upon boot.


My old PDP11/73 (now in a museum) had two RX02, never had an RX01. Surprisingly fast! It also had two RL02s and a couple of RD54s in.

Building an RT11 system disk onto an RL02 off another RL02 made the downstairs neighbours complain quite a lot, even though the floor slab in my flat was about 40cm thick concrete. They didn't muck about with these 1960s tower blocks but it was no match for a pair of pint glass sized head actuators and a pair of washing machine motors.


Finall I guess all of them are somehow involved?

Small fries at McD had been lately around 2,99 EUR, that was very expensive given that the "small fries" are actually really small :-D

They’ve been driving people to use their app for years now. The menu prices isn’t what one pays if they use the app, since it has a constant stream of coupons and discounts that bring the list price down.

Pretty much a standard 20% off, sometimes 25% as a deal depending on amount spent. BOGO value menu McDouble / McChickens. Points that add up to actually free food. Items not on the menu in store. It's robbery if you don't use their app now.

I’m not convinced it’s that good because of how the deals are structured. For example, top deal where I am at the moment is 9 chicken nuggets plus two medium drinks plus two sauces for 1990 HUF. That’s a two person deal (you don’t need two drinks if you’re on your own), but there are no chips, add a large chips to share at 1270 HUF and your meal costs 3260 HUF. Two four nugget McMoment deals comes to 3060 HUF (small fries, small drink). Are an extra 80ml of coke and half a nugget each worth 200 HUF? Maybe? But it’s definitely not the huge savings it purports to be.

This walkthrough is just an example, open the app yourself and have a look, most of the deals are just an item or two away from being a thing people would actually order.


I agree and don't use those deals. The items or sizes are wrong. I'm always offered "20% off purchases of $10 or more", "$2 any size fries", "$0.29 any size soft drink / tea with minimum spend of $3" which I think are pretty decent and always a savings.

If I do eat McDonalds its usually just a burger + fry + drink usually around ~$6ish unless I'm ordering for others.


I’d rather pay full price than sell McDonalds my data, I’ll never notice paying 25% more given how little I eat there.

If everyone else refused to sell their data, we wouldn’t be in this position.


In the US, a rule of thumb for restaurant economics is that only about 25-35% of an item's price is the cost of ingredients, when you average over all menu items (of course some items better margins than others). The rest goes into labor, fixed costs, etc. It varies a bit by region and by market segment (e.g. fast food vs fast casual vs fine dining), but not by too much.

For McDonald's fries it's certainly much less than 25%. These are a high margin item, I wouldn't be surprised if ingredients costs is only 5% of that €2.99

Of course! That is why I qualified it as "averaged over all menu items". The expectation is that higher-margin items are purchased in a volume that balances out lower-margin items.

Also sodas/fountain drinks are famously high-margin. Depending on the size, as much as a third of the COGS comes from the disposable cup.


Japan: McFry S Size ¥ 200~ (1.09 EUR) M Size ¥ 330~ (1.80 EUR) L Size ¥ 380~ (2.07 EUR) * Prices may differ at selected restaurants and for delivery.

Most of it is probably labor, marketing & franchise fees, rent, utilities, and equipment depreciation. Raw ingredients are likely 5-10%.

but... will this solution be Cloud Native?

:-D


++1

"target market product alignment" :-D


> But I shudder to think of the security issues when the agents start

Today I cleaned up mails from 10 years ago - honestly: When looking at the stuff I found "from back then" I would be shuddering much much more about sharing old mail content from 10+y and having a completely wrong image of me :-D


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: