Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Barbing's commentslogin

They swiped through the photo gallery on your phone, right? (Standard for years from what I know based on Latin America to USA)

I really love that. Can't wait for your writeup!

The pendant is almost ready, I'll write it up this week!

Sneak peek: https://imgz.org/i6xDDz6x/


Do you remember where you heard this by chance?

I wonder with which companies they partner for those deliveries. Maybe they went with Japan's biggest courier or well, I'm sure they don't do it in house...

>anything wrong with that?

Wonder if the courts will move fast enough to generally matter.


As I understand it, reverse engineering for the purpose of interoperability is allowed under the law. The only thing subject to copyright is your code. So long as a separate implementation (made by an AI model or made by hand) doesn't use any of your actual code, you have no claim over it. Only the code is yours.

AI models make the process of reversing and reimplementing drivers much cheaper. I don't understand the problem with that - it sounds like a glorious future to me. Making drivers cheaper and easier to write should mean more operating systems, with more higher quality drivers. I can't wait for asahi linux to support Apple's newer hardware. I'm also looking forward to better linux and freebsd drivers. And more hobbyist operating systems able to fully take advantage of modern computing hardware.

I don't see any downside.


Drivers are usually easy to implement. What’s usually lacking is the specifications of the hardware. A lot of devices are similar enough that you can reuse a lot of existing code, but you do want to know which registers to read or fill.

Which class? Or what subjects

That’s wonderful so I want it to be true. Your comment is one of the top results on my search for more info!

I was also curious and couldn’t find anything at all backing this claim. Seems like a complete fabrication, as plausible as it sounds.

Moreover, molasses was shipped from America and not the other way around.



Sounds like this might be your area of expertise. For the rest of us, take a shoebox. How much ballpark extra weight we talkin’ to have a livable planet? (Maybe the mushrooms would be ~2x as heavy as standard shoeboxes for example, to meet existing spec.)

Or how about for the glasses box they show on the site in OP, or a plastic sleeve like Americans sell Oreo cookies in. Anybody have any guesses?


I've done some experiments with mycelium as a construction material, but I'm hardly an expert. Mycelium weighs anywhere between 50 and 950kg/m3. Usually you won't have mycelium as thin as cardboard, because you want use mycelium as a 3d buffer, replacing styrofoam. EPS (styrofoam) has densities of 15-30kg/m3. So while it's more sustainable it's also heavier.

Hopefully not used as packaging for Oreos, because unless the fungus has been highly adapted to the substrate, the mycelium will try to grow into the food. Oyster mycelium won't be toxic, but I don't want my Oreos to taste like mushrooms.

I don't think the packaging is supposed to be alive at the time of usage.

Heavy means more fuel to ship it. Maybe still a net-win, I don't know.

Do people ever try to irradiate or fumigate or however they’d treat the woodchips?

Maybe it would cost 10 times as much as the wood chips themselves… small batch spore bakeoffs…


Adding poisons (fumigation) is definitely not a good idea. In mushroom plants the compost/humus used to grow mushrooms is often steam boiled to sterilize it, to keep the yields high and the production safe from any dangerous contamination. It is seeded with the spores of the desired species afterwards.

Pressure cooking in small batches is the diy standard, I've had good results with a standard insta-pot

you could probably autoclave it with a standard dental/tattooing autoclave (~500 USD and requires a gas stove)

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: