Because it adds significant validation to my premise that AI is simply "automation improved" at this juncture and a crutch more than a viable tool in 90% of use cases.
In short, seeing "I made this because I was tired of wasting time with writing letters while applying for jobs" has me dying with laughter because the translation I come up with is "I am so crippled by laziness I'm recalcitrant to do the work to actually get the position to do work" and that's my take-away.
Of course there will be arguments to my perspective and I welcome them. I would like to feature them in my writings on this subject. AI is a shortcut for lazy, otherwise talentless people. I say this as neither.
Wondered if it was a yet-unexplained indicator I'd been banned, which I figured peculiar, as my worst mental health episodes are behind me and my participation here is of better quality of late and is aiming to continue that path. It is a nice shade. Reminds me of trying to select the appropriate Crayola for a mood or vibe. This fits.
As a side note I’m looking forward to unenforceable copyright protections and the resulting free for all in other arenas like music. Use 1% AI? 0% protected. Boo hoo.
I am a nobody who had a mental health breakdown following an ugly divorce and even though I settled my case - 380 days in solitary, Plea Bargain for Class A Misdemeanor - last month I was cuffed and interrogated in one county simply because I visited downtown and my plates were picked up in a different county when I was trying to navigate family law related obligations.
To put it another way, I'm on a legal-to-harass-list probably for the rest of my life and likely can't do a damn thing about it...beyond the obvious, which I've chosen, which is to enjoy a low-key, crime free, introspective creative sabbatical as much as possible on the fringes of society. Last thing I'm interested in is...whatever they accused me of this time...
What the holy fuck are you talking about with "retain full control" without "legal regulation" as a divergent concept? Are you huffing paint? I'm seriously at a loss how you can possibly hold these two notions concurrently without being certifiably insane or a sociopath.
lol maybe to clarify: if I make something, just because you use it doesn't give you the right to compel me to change it for you... you can ask politely but can't force my actions
This was very apparent to me on IG before I shut down my account (again) here in the US.
Women promoting themselves (photography, DJ, art, small biz) want to give off the scent of being available. Rarely does a woman have an account simply to share life - it is a messaging and broadcasting channel suited to their gender chemistry. They want the guys to think they have a shot of sorts. It’s a deceptive marketing practice and part of the reason I quit (I met a couple of the local women were playing this game).
Cephalopods are the most highly evolved species living on planet Earth. They survived the first surface extinction. They'll survive the second. No wonder they prefer staying down there. Disclaimer: I had a wild dream in jail one night that made me reconsider some notions about...
Wow I wonder how fun conversations in the afterlife with Aaron are going to be for the OP. There are ways to improve broken systems. Pimping them out with glee is not one of them in my book.
Everything about this concept I hate and it’s difficult not to conflate that with the creator. I make comparisons and equivocations. This is an ethical discussion akin to “Can you enjoy Bill Cosby comedy knowing he was a Rapist” and I’m not being glib.
Tell that to judyrecords with the same smug attitude.
Your textbook versus reality conceptualization of things is dogshit. It’s exploitation to do what OP did. You’re endorsing it and minimizing the ethics and this certainly shall poison the well from which you drink. Godspeed.
Why?
Because it adds significant validation to my premise that AI is simply "automation improved" at this juncture and a crutch more than a viable tool in 90% of use cases.
In short, seeing "I made this because I was tired of wasting time with writing letters while applying for jobs" has me dying with laughter because the translation I come up with is "I am so crippled by laziness I'm recalcitrant to do the work to actually get the position to do work" and that's my take-away.
Of course there will be arguments to my perspective and I welcome them. I would like to feature them in my writings on this subject. AI is a shortcut for lazy, otherwise talentless people. I say this as neither.
reply