Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Can you write down your actual analysis of the disposition of political capital, factions, interest groups, etc.?

People aren’t just going to take your word that A outweighs B modulo C, or that B outweighs A modulo C. There needs to be some credible substance.





Sorry, did I accidentally wander into a political action group working meeting, and you're mistaking me for the chairperson or something? If you have actual money and people working on this, don't take your cues form some rando on the internet!

I thought this was a site where we talk about ideas and see what people's perspectives are. @basilikum asked why on earth @mchusma would advocate "pay to extend" instead of "14+14 no extensions". I gave my own personal take. I'd be totally happy to be wrong about the political viability of "14+14 no extensions". If you have actual data, or even just a different take on the situation, I'm all ears.


So then "You're never going to win that one.” was just a random guess?

Why pretend if there’s no substance at all backing it up?


Again, you seem to misunderstand what this kind of forum is about. I gave my layperson's judgement and my reasons. If you don't agree with them, the thing to do is to point out where you think things are wrong, or add in your own take. That's what will lead to an interesting discussion where we learn from each other.

And this opinion is also based on your… random guesses?

You can probably see the problem then. How do I know if your random guesses have any meaning at all, couldn’t they just be gibberish?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: