Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
Zig 0.14.0 Release Notes (ziglang.org)
91 points by tauoverpi 9 months ago | hide | past | favorite | 17 comments


Thank you, so many great features. My personal favorite is .declLiteral() syntax, which makes webserver route-configuration very easy and readable!

If you are ever in temptation to do a builder for internal DSL, .declLiteral() might be a better way. I think it might be very cool for GUI structures too.

I did a quick PoC for SQL query building, but unfortunately, any more advanced queries are better to copy & serialize their arguments for safety reasons, so not that useful there, but still, very hyped about this particular thing.


https://ziglang.org/download/0.14.0/release-notes.html#Decl-...

There's something weird about the example that's being given. Coming from C it feels like I am making my struct much bigger... But is it implemented as a pointer to another struct ?


Really liking the promotion of "Unmanaged" containers. It's the ones I'm using everywhere already


I really wish FreeBSD were a tier 1 OS.


We're probably going to add support for cross-compiling FreeBSD's libc in the near future (and I imagine the other BSDs as well). From there, I think the only blocker for Tier 1 is getting it built and tested in CI.


Please do a release party!!! The last one was so much fun! _


Great work on the self-hosted (no llvm) compiler and linker !

Is there somebody that can explain to me the value of incremental compilation?

How is this different than CMake caching, for example?


My understanding is that Zig's incremental compilation will work on a much more granular level (i.e. functions, etc), so, for example, change one function and only that function (and its dependencies) will get recompiled/relinked (there's some linker trickery involved to avoid needing to relink everything IIUC).

More details here: https://ziggit.dev/t/how-zig-incremental-compilation-is-impl...


Why would the function's dependencies need recompilation? I guess the dependees may require it, if they inlined it, or if the signature changed.


I'm probably not describing it fully accurately. See the link for the proper explanation.


Thanks for sharing !


What's the state of async/await by the way?


Cut for the foreseeable future AFAIK. They may return to it when ready


Nice


Thanks!


No haiku-os :-(


Hm, I didn't think to add Haiku to the support table. It's probably Tier 3; the standard library support is minimal, and we don't support cross-compiling its libc. Patches definitely welcome.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: